Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Can adhesive cementation improve the strength of glass-ceramics by filling surface defects?
Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva1, Alex Zonneveld1, Yuqing Lu1
1Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background:
The susceptibility of glass-ceramics to surface defects can weaken their mechanical performance.
Objectives:
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of cementation on the load-to-failure of 2 glass-ceramic materials in the presence and absence of an induced surface defect.
Material And Methods:
Bars of lithium disilicate - LD (Initial LiSi Block; GC Dental) and feldspathic - F (VITA Mark II; VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter) ceramics, as well as a dentin analog, were prepared for cementation. The ceramic specimens were assigned to 5 groups: untreated (no cementation); indented (I); cemented (C); indented and cemented with defect filling (CI); and indented and cemented without defect filling (CIN). Flexural strength was measured for the non-cemented specimens, whereas the load-to-failure was evaluated for all cemented groups, using the ball-in-hole test on bar specimens (1 × 1 × 12 mm). Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed for the groups without induced defects. Data was analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05).
Results:
One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences among the groups for both materials (p < 0.001). For LD, the load-to-failure values were: LDC (16.7 ±2.9 N)A > LD (14.6 ±2.6 N)B = LDCI (13.9 ±3.0 N)B > LDCIN (10.5 ±1.7 N)C > LDI (6.9 ±1.4 N)D. For F, the values were: FC (13.7 ±3.7 N)A = FCIN (13.1 ±3.3 N)A = FCI (11.8 ±3.3 N)A > F (8.1 ±1.3 N)B > FI (5.1 ±0.4 N)C. Indentation significantly reduced the flexural strength of the non-cemented ceramics (p < 0.001). Finite element analysis showed that cementation reduced the maximum principal tensile stress by 44% for LD and by 62% for F.
Conclusions:
Filling surface defects with cement increased the load-to-failure of LD, but did not significantly affect F. Overall, the mechanical performance of both glass-ceramics was influenced by the cementation process, whereas the effect of defect filling was material dependent.
Related Concept Videos
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
Additives and Fillers in Concrete
The...
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in ASTM C...
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is critical—it...
Soundness of Cement
Aggregate Cement Ratio