Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of commercially available molecularly matched targeted therapies in the
Suzanne Jones1, Gerald Falchook2, Stephanie Graff3
1Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, United States.
Background:
Initial studies have shown improved outcomes in patients receiving cancer therapies matched to their molecular alterations. To improve the chances of finding a therapeutic match for patients, this study evaluated the preliminary antitumor activity of 3 commercially available multitargeted agents in the United States, regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib.
Methods:
In this phase II trial, patients who did not benefit from first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), upper aerodigestive tract cancers, non-colon gastrointestinal cancers, and urothelial carcinoma underwent next-generation sequencing to identify actionable genomic alterations. Eligible patients, based on identified mutations deemed treatable by regorafenib, cabozantinib, or afatinib, were enrolled to receive matched targeted therapies. Outcomes were monitored via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, with dose modifications per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v4.03 guidelines for adverse events (AEs).
Results:
One hundred patients with metastatic cancers were enrolled across tumor types. Median treatment durations were 12 weeks (regorafenib), 10.7 weeks (afatinib), and 24.1 weeks (cabozantinib). The overall objective response rate was 7.0%, with 1 complete response and 8 partial responses. The clinical benefit rate, including responses and stable disease >6 months, was 16.0%. Median progression-free survival ranged from 1.9 months for urothelial carcinoma to 3.2 months for NSCLC. Toxicities were common for all medications; for regorafenib, 90.7% of patients had AEs (50% Grade 3/4); for afatinib, 86% of patients had AEs (54% Grade 3/4); for cabozantinib, 100% of patients had AEs (36% Grade 3/4). The most common AEs were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, and stomatitis.
Conclusions:
Regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib had modest effects when used as molecularly matched targeted therapies in patients with NSCLC, upper aerodigestive tract cancers, non-colon gastrointestinal cancers, and urothelial carcinoma in the second-line setting. Future research could examine more precise matching of therapies to genomic alterations and evaluate combination therapies.
Insights
Regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib showed modest antitumor activity in patients with advanced cancers when matched to genomic alterations. Further research is needed for more precise therapy matching and combination strategies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Molecular alterations in cancer guide targeted therapy selection.
- Multi-targeted agents like regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib are available for cancer treatment.
- Evaluating these agents in a molecularly matched setting is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the preliminary antitumor activity of regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib.
- To evaluate the efficacy of these agents as molecularly matched targeted therapies.
- To identify potential benefits and toxicities in patients with specific advanced cancers.
Main Methods:
- A Phase II trial enrolled 100 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, upper aerodigestive tract cancers, non-colon gastrointestinal cancers, and urothelial carcinoma.
- Next-generation sequencing identified actionable genomic alterations for targeted therapy selection.
- Patients received matched regorafenib, cabozantinib, or afatinib, with outcomes monitored using RECIST and AE guidelines.
Main Results:
- The overall objective response rate was 7.0% (1 complete, 8 partial responses).
- The clinical benefit rate (response or stable disease >6 months) was 16.0%.
- Toxicities were frequent, with high rates of Grade 3/4 adverse events for all agents, including diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea.
Conclusions:
- Regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib demonstrated modest efficacy as second-line molecularly matched therapies in selected advanced cancers.
- More precise matching of therapies to genomic alterations and investigation of combination therapies are warranted.
- These findings highlight the need for continued research in personalized cancer treatment strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
