Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Imaging CD19+ B Cells in an Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Mouse Model using Positron Emission Tomography
Published on: January 20, 2023
Revisiting intensity normalization in brain [18F]FDG PET: What is reliable in autoimmune encephalitis?
Fiene Marie Kuijper1, Antoine Rogeau2, Hélène Rostand3
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France.
Proportional scaling (PS) and iterative PS (iPS) normalization methods are more effective than reference region (RR) normalization for detecting brain metabolism changes in autoimmune encephalitis (AE). These findings are crucial for standardizing neuroinflammation imaging analysis.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Nuclear Medicine
- Neurology
Background:
- Data-driven intensity normalization is an alternative to traditional methods in brain [18F]FDG PET.
- Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) presents challenges for normalization due to variable metabolic patterns and lack of a reliable disease-free reference region.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare proportional scaling (PS), iterative PS (iPS), and pons-based reference-region (RR) normalization methods in patients with definite AE.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different normalization techniques in identifying metabolic abnormalities in AE.
Main Methods:
- Three normalization methods (PS, iPS, RR) were applied to brain [18F]FDG PET images from AE patients and healthy controls (HC).
- Voxel-based comparisons (SPM12) were used to assess differences between AE and HC groups.
- Longitudinal analysis was performed on two limbic AE cases.
Main Results:
- PS and iPS detected basal ganglia and mesiotemporal hypermetabolism in AE vs. HC, which RR failed to identify.
- All methods showed cortical hypometabolism, with RR revealing slightly more extensive areas.
- PS and iPS better captured initial abnormalities in longitudinal follow-up compared to RR.
Conclusions:
- PS and iPS normalization methods appear more robust than RR for brain [18F]FDG PET in AE.
- Standardized normalization protocols are essential for consistent analysis of neuroinflammatory disorders.
Related Concept Videos
Encephalitis l: Introduction
Encephalitis ll: Pathophysiology
![Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58641.jpg&w=3840&q=50)