Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Occlusion of the Great and Small Saphenous Vein Using Copolymeric Glue Based on N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate and Methacryloxy Sulfolane
Published on: December 9, 2022
Comparing major adverse limb events in claudicants with complete, partial, and nonadherence to preoperative
Richard Shi1, Nicholas Bulatao1, Rupak Mukherjee1
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Insights
Complete adherence to guideline-directed care (GDC) before surgery significantly reduces major adverse limb events (MALE) in claudicants. Partial adherence offers no significant benefit, highlighting the importance of full GDC for long-term risk mitigation.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Limb Salvage
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Guideline-directed care (GDC) for claudicants includes optimal medical therapy (OMT) and supervised exercise therapy (SET).
- Surgery is recommended for severe lifestyle-limiting symptoms unresponsive to GDC.
- Many claudicants undergoing intervention have not completed full pre-operative GDC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of pre-operative guideline-directed care (GDC) adherence on two-year major adverse limb events (MALE) in claudicants.
- To compare outcomes between complete, partial, and non-adherence to GDC.
- To assess the protective effect of GDC on MALE after intervention.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 258 claudicants undergoing open surgery or endovascular intervention (2016-2023).
- GDC adherence defined by documentation of severe symptoms, OMT, and exercise therapy completion.
- Two-year MALE (major amputation or reintervention) as the primary outcome, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression.
Main Results:
- 12.8% had complete GDC adherence, 73.3% partial, and 13.9% non-adherence.
- Two-year MALE-free survival was 87.9% for complete adherence, 76.7% for partial, and 66.6% for non-adherence (p < 0.01).
- Complete adherence significantly decreased MALE risk (HR 0.24), while partial adherence did not (HR 0.99).
Conclusions:
- Complete adherence to pre-operative GDC is protective against two-year MALE in claudicants undergoing intervention.
- Partial adherence to GDC may not provide similar protection against MALE.
- Improving pre-operative GDC adherence is crucial for long-term risk mitigation and preventing complications in claudicants.
Objective:
The Society for Vascular Surgery recommends surgery be reserved for claudicants with severe lifestyle-limiting symptoms despite optimal medical therapy and supervised exercise therapy-the sum of these known as guideline-directed care (GDC). However, most claudicants do not receive the full spectrum of GDC prior to open surgery or endovascular intervention. We investigate the impact of complete vs partial vs nonadherence to preoperative GDC in claudicants and assess its impact on 2-year major adverse limb events (MALEs).
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was performed on claudicants with open surgery or endovascular intervention at a tertiary care institution between 2016 and 2023. GDC was measured prior to surgery and defined as (1) severe lifestyle limitation documentation, (2) optimal medical therapy adherence (composite of single antiplatelet agent, lipid-lowering therapy, smoking cessation), and (3) exercise therapy completion. Partial adherence was defined by meeting one or two of these components, and nonadherence was defined by meeting none of the components. The primary outcome was 2-year MALE, defined as a composite of major amputation or major open/endovascular reintervention of the target limb. Statistical analysis included one-way analysis of variance, Pearson χ2 tests, Kaplan-Meier, and univariable and multivariable Cox regression modeling.
Results:
Of the 258 claudicants receiving open surgery or endovascular intervention, 13.9% demonstrated nonadherence to GDC, 73.3% demonstrated partial adherence, and 12.8% demonstrated complete adherence. MALE was seen in 23.3% of claudicants at 2 years, primarily because of reinterventions. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, claudicants with nonadherence to GDC demonstrated a 2-year MALE-free survival of 66.6%, partial adherence with 76.7%, and complete adherence with 87.9% (P < .01). On multivariable Cox regression modeling, patients with complete guideline adherence demonstrated a decreased risk of MALE (hazard ratio, 0.24 [0.09, 0.69]) when compared with nonadherence, whereas partial adherence did not (hazard ratio, 0.99 [0.56, 1.74]).
Conclusions:
Complete adherence to preoperative GDC is protective against MALE in claudicants undergoing intervention out to 2 years postintervention, whereas partial adherence may not offer a similar benefit. Future studies must prioritize improving adherence rates prior to surgery in claudicants to ensure long-term risk mitigation and prevent complications.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management