Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Comprehensive Endovascular and Open Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
Published on: October 20, 2017
Genicular Artery Embolization for Chronic Knee Pain: Expert Consensus Recommendations on Indications, Technique and
A Taheri Amin1,2, J Golzarian3,4, K Abd El Tawab5
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. arian.taheri-amin@charite.de.
Purpose:
To develop expert-consensus recommendations for patient selection, technique and clinical management in genicular artery embolization (GAE) using a Delphi process.
Materials And Methods:
A working group developed a 75-statement questionnaire. A panel of musculoskeletal and interventional radiologists (IRs), selected based on clinical experience, scientific expertise and geographic diversity, scored each response using a 10-point Likert-scale across three rounds. Consensus was predefined as ≥ 75% of ratings ≥ 7/10.
Results:
Twenty-nine IRs completed all three rounds. Consensus inclusion criteria for GAE include knee pain refractory to conservative treatment for ≥ 3 months due to osteoarthritis, tendinopathies or prior knee surgery and recurrent hemarthrosis (median 9[IQR 7-10]; 86% ≥ 7). Pre-procedural assessment should include standardized outcome measures, clinical examination and knee radiographs. Contrast-enhanced MRI is optional for osteoarthritis phenotyping and grading of synovitis, differential diagnosis and outcome prediction (8[7-10]; 79% ≥ 7). Via an ipsilateral antegrade transfemoral access, all visible genicular arteries should be catheterized and embolized upon detection of a hypervascular blush (9[7-10]; 76% ≥ 7). No evidence of superiority of either temporary or permanent embolic agents in terms of safety or efficacy has been demonstrated (10[8-10]; 86% ≥ 7). Structured long-term follow-up is recommended, with clinical success defined as achievement of the minimal clinically important difference or individual patient satisfaction (9[7-10]; 83% ≥ 7). Contralateral or repeat GAE may be considered for bilateral knee pain, insufficient response or pain recurrence (8[7-10]; 76% ≥ 7).
Conclusion:
This Delphi study establishes expert-derived consensus recommendations for GAE, emphasizing broad indications, patient-tailored technique and an active role of the IR in multidisciplinary longitudinal care.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management