Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
A No-Code, Guideline-Based Custom GPT Outperforms Cardiologists in Response Quality for Cardiac Amyloidosis
Goro Fujiki1, Satoshi Kodera2, Hiroyuki Morita2
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Third Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
A new AI tool, AmyloGPT, provides expert-level answers for cardiac amyloidosis (CA) questions, outperforming cardiologists. This no-code solution can improve care access for this growing condition.
Area of Science:
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Clinical Decision Support Systems
- Medical Guideline Implementation
Background:
- Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is increasingly recognized in clinical practice.
- The potential of guideline-based large language models (LLMs) to achieve clinician-level answer quality for CA is currently unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a custom generative pretrained transformer (GPT) model, AmyloGPT, based on clinical guidelines.
- To evaluate if AmyloGPT's response quality for CA matches or surpasses that of board-certified cardiologists.
Main Methods:
- AmyloGPT was developed using OpenAI's GPT Builder, integrating the 2020 Japanese Circulation Society CA guidelines.
- Seventy-one clinical questions were generated by nonspecialist physicians and answered by board-certified cardiologists.
- A blinded, comparative study assessed paired responses by nonspecialist and cardiologist evaluators using preference and Likert scales.
Main Results:
- AmyloGPT was preferred over cardiologist responses by 81.1% of nonspecialist evaluators and 83.6% of cardiologist evaluators (P < 0.001).
- Nonspecialist evaluators rated AmyloGPT higher for intent alignment and clinical usefulness (P < 0.001).
- Cardiologist evaluators rated AmyloGPT higher across all quality dimensions: accuracy, consistency, validity, completeness, and absence of bias (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- A no-code, guideline-based custom GPT (AmyloGPT) demonstrated superior response quality compared to cardiologists for CA-related queries.
- This approach enables clinicians to create disease-specific LLMs without programming, potentially enhancing care accessibility.
- Further research is necessary to address potential inaccuracies like hallucinations in LLM outputs.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

