Children's Height and Injury Risk With Child Restraint Systems

Hsuan-Fan Tung1, Jen-Fu Huang2,3,4, Jhih-Ming Tang2

  • 1Division of Pediatric Surgery, Jen-Ai Hospital, Dali Branch, Taichung, Taiwan.

JAMA Network Open
|July 23, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Child restraint systems (CRSs) may increase head and neck injuries in children compared to seat belts (SBs). Injury patterns vary non-linearly with height, suggesting current transition thresholds may be inadequate.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric trauma
  • Occupant protection
  • Injury biomechanics

Background:

  • Child restraint systems (CRSs) and seat belts (SBs) transition is based on fixed age/height.
  • Height-specific injury patterns in children using CRSs vs. SBs are not well-characterized.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Examine height-associated regional injury patterns in children from motor vehicle crashes.
  • Assess injury pattern variations between CRS and SB users based on height.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 6503 children (6-11 years) from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2020).
  • Used inverse probability of treatment weighting and restricted cubic spline modeling for height-dependent analysis.
  • Evaluated severe regional injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥3).

Main Results:

  • CRS use was linked to higher severe head/neck and spinal cord injuries compared to SBs.
  • A nonlinear, height-dependent association between restraint type and injury patterns was observed.
  • Children 110-140 cm using CRSs had more severe spinal/thoracic injuries but fewer abdominal injuries.

Conclusions:

  • The association between child restraint devices and injury patterns is height-dependent and nonlinear.
  • A shift in injury anatomy occurs across the 110-140 cm height range.
  • Uniform age/height thresholds may not fully capture growth-specific vulnerabilities in child occupant protection.
Abstract