Antimicrobial stewardship in UK special care baby units: gaps in research and future directions
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Amedine Duret1, Frances Davies2, Felicity Fitzgerald1,3
1Section of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Infection, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Insights
Neonatal sepsis antibiotic stewardship research is mainly in Level 3 units, not the Level 1 and 2 units where most infants receive care. Future studies must include these lower-acuity settings for effective antimicrobial stewardship.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Antimicrobial Stewardship
Background:
- Neonatal sepsis remains a concern, leading to antibiotic overprescription despite declining incidence.
- Antimicrobial stewardship is crucial for combating resistance and preventing infant dysbiosis, as per the UK National Action Plan.
- Current research predominantly focuses on high-resource Level 3 Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the misalignment between current neonatal stewardship research settings and actual clinical practice.
- To explore barriers in transferring stewardship models from intensive care to lower-acuity settings.
- To advocate for the inclusion of Level 1 and 2 neonatal populations in future research.
Main Methods:
- This viewpoint analyzes operational and structural barriers to stewardship model transferability.
- It identifies research gaps in baseline prescribing and multidisciplinary collaboration.
- It reviews the current evidence base for neonatal antimicrobial stewardship.
Main Results:
- Most neonatal stewardship research occurs in Level 3 NICUs, not Level 1 and 2 units where most infants are treated.
- Significant barriers hinder the application of intensive-care stewardship models in lower-acuity settings.
- Key research gaps exist regarding prescribing practices and collaboration in Level 1 and 2 units.
Conclusions:
- There is a critical need to bridge the gap between intensive-care-focused stewardship research and the reality of care in Level 1 and 2 neonatal units.
- Future validation studies for neonatal sepsis diagnostics must incorporate Level 1 and 2 populations.
- Inclusion of all neonatal care settings is essential for effective antimicrobial resistance strategies.
Abstract:
Despite a significant decline in the incidence of neonatal sepsis, the clinical imperative to avoid missing life-threatening infection continues to drive widespread antibiotic overprescription. Antimicrobial stewardship is universally recognized and explicitly mandated within the UK 2024-2029 National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance as a critical mechanism to combat resistance and prevent iatrogenic harms related to infant dysbiosis. However, a major misalignment exists within the current evidence base: most of the neonatal stewardship research is conducted in highly resourced, tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Units (Level 3), even though most postnatal inpatient care occurs in Special Care Baby Units (Level 1) and Local Neonatal Units (Level 2). This Viewpoint explores the operational and structural barriers that limit the transferability of intensive-care stewardship models to lower-acuity settings, identifies key research gaps around baseline prescribing practices and multidisciplinary collaboration, and argues for the inclusion of Level 1 and 2 populations in future validation studies of emerging diagnostic tools for neonatal sepsis.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Microbiota Modulation by Antibiotics
Development of Human Microbiota
