Related Experiment Videos
Reframing faculty development for digital transformation and generative AI in higher education
Zhitao Hou1, Jing Chen1, Hao Zhang1
1College of Basic Medical and Sciences, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Frontiers in Medicine
|July 23, 2026
Summary
Faculty professional development must evolve beyond tool training to address diverse needs in the digital era. A new framework supports stage-specific growth from adaptation to leadership, integrating digital skills with pedagogy and organizational change.
Area of Science:
- Educational Technology
- Higher Education Studies
- Faculty Development
Background:
- Digitalization and generative AI are transforming higher education teaching.
- Current faculty development often uses standardized training, failing to meet diverse teacher needs across career stages.
- There's a need for differentiated support in digital competence, curriculum innovation, and leadership.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically account for stage-specific developmental tasks of university faculty in the digital era.
- To advance a multi-level, developmental framework for faculty professional development.
- To guide faculty development beyond tool training towards pedagogical and organizational transformation.
Main Methods:
- Explicit review questions, database-based literature retrieval, and thematic synthesis informed the framework.
- Scholarship on teacher digital competence, professional development theory, and digital transformation in higher education was synthesized.
- The framework was formulated within the institutional context of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine.
Main Results:
- A multi-level, developmental framework for faculty development in the digital era was proposed.
- The framework is structured around four stages: entry and adaptation, stable development, deep integration, and academic leadership.
- Implementation pathways include blended learning, cross-boundary linkage, community learning, mentoring, and evidence-informed practice.
Conclusions:
- Faculty development should shift from tool-centric training to systematic capacity building in pedagogy, digital ethics, and leadership.
- The proposed framework enhances stage-specific relevance, practical application, and organizational integration of faculty development.
- This provides a theoretical reference for designing faculty development systems in digitally transformed universities.
Related Concept Videos
Non-equilibrium in the Cell
An important concept in studying metabolism and energy is that of chemical equilibrium. Most chemical reactions are reversible. They can proceed in both directions, releasing energy into their environment in one direction, and absorbing it from the environment in the other direction. The same is true for the chemical reactions involved in cell metabolism, such as the breaking down and building up of proteins into and from individual amino acids, respectively. Reactants within a closed system...
Growth versus Fixed Mindset
Carol Dweck introduced the term mindset to describe individuals' beliefs about their intellectual and personal capabilities. These beliefs significantly influence psychological processes such as motivation, goal-setting, and perseverance, ultimately shaping academic and life outcomes. Individuals generally possess one of two mindsets- a fixed or a growth mindset—each promoting different responses to success, failure, and challenge.Fixed vs. Growth MindsetA fixed mindset assumes that one's...