Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Full-Circle Cauterization of Limbal Vascular Plexus for Surgically Induced Glaucoma in Rodents
Published on: February 15, 2022
Multimodal foundation model assistance for differentiating primary open-angle glaucoma in highly myopic eyes
Houfa Yin1, Kaikai Zhao1, Qi Miao1
1Eye Center of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases; Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, China.
Purpose:
To develop and evaluate a multimodal foundation-model-assisted system for differentiating primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) from non-glaucoma in highly myopic eyes and assessing whether artificial intelligence (AI) assistance changes ophthalmologist diagnostic performance.
Design:
Retrospective diagnostic model-development study with internal validation and paired sequential multi-reader evaluation.
Participants:
Model development used 603 eye-level cases (502 POAG, 101 non-glaucoma); a fixed 150-case set from 149 patients was used for internal test reporting and the paired reader evaluation.
Methods:
A RETFound-based multimodal classifier used color fundus photographs, optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, and 24 structured OCT/retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) variables. Six ophthalmologists reviewed each case without and then with AI assistance after a washout interval.
Main Outcome Measures:
Model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC); reader sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1 score, confidence, reading time, diagnostic switching, and inter-reader agreement.
Results:
The final multimodal model achieved an AUC of 0.911 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.862-0.950) on the fixed 150-case set. In the sequential paired evaluation, unaided versus AI-assisted mean sensitivity was 68.0% versus 75.3%, accuracy was 74.2% versus 79.6%, F1 score was 0.790 versus 0.844, and mean specificity was 91.3% in both phases; Fleiss kappa was 0.583 versus 0.709. Reader-level diagnostic differences were not significant after multiplicity adjustment and were exploratory.
Conclusions:
In this internal retrospective study, the AI-assisted phase showed numerically higher mean sensitivity, accuracy, confidence, and inter-reader agreement than the unaided phase, with unchanged mean specificity. Reader-level diagnostic differences were not statistically significant after multiplicity adjustment and should be considered exploratory. Prospective multicenter validation is required before clinical deployment.
Related Concept Videos
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Glaucoma: Overview
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment