Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Patients With Index PCI Coronary Complications: A
Alessandro Gabrielli1, Jacob J Elscot1, William Camilleri1
1Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Insights
Immediate complete revascularization (ICR) is safe for acute coronary syndrome patients with unresolved complications, showing similar outcomes to staged complete revascularization (SCR). Complex lesion morphology and STEMI presentation predict complications.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Complete revascularization (CR) improves outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with multivessel disease (MVD) over culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- The optimal timing for CR, immediate (ICR) versus staged (SCR), remains under investigation, particularly concerning unresolved procedural complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess if unresolved culprit-lesion complications impact outcomes of ICR versus SCR.
- To identify predictors of procedural complications in patients undergoing PCI for ACS with MVD.
Main Methods:
- Post hoc analysis of the BIOVASC trial involving 1487 patients.
- Classification and assessment of culprit-lesion-related complications and their resolution status.
- Evaluation of 2-year clinical outcomes (MACE) based on randomized ICR vs. SCR strategy and logistic regression for complication predictors.
Main Results:
- 10.3% of procedures had culprit-lesion complications, with 81.7% unresolved post-PCI.
- Patients with unresolved complications showed similar 2-year MACE rates between ICR (10.6%) and SCR (17.2%).
- Complex culprit lesion morphology (B2/C) and STEMI presentation were independent predictors of procedural complications.
Conclusions:
- Immediate complete revascularization (ICR) demonstrates comparable 2-year outcomes to staged complete revascularization (SCR) in patients with unresolved culprit lesion complications.
- Complex lesion morphology and STEMI presentation are significant predictors of procedural complications.
- ICR is a safe and viable strategy for hemodynamically stable patients, even with procedural challenges during PCI.
Background:
In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and multivessel disease (MVD), complete revascularization (CR) improves clinical outcomes compared with culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the optimal timing of CR, immediate (ICR) versus staged (SCR), remains debated.
Aims:
This post hoc analysis of the BIOVASC trial aimed to evaluate whether unresolved culprit-lesion-related complications influence outcomes of ICR compared with SCR and to identify predictors of procedural complications.
Methods:
Among 1525 patients enrolled in BIOVASC, 1487 index coronary angiographies were analyzed. Coronary complications related to culprit lesion PCI were classified and assessed for resolution status. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 2-year follow-up according to randomized treatment strategy (ICR vs. SCR). Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of complications.
Results:
Culprit-lesion-related complications occurred in 153 of 1487 procedures (10.3%), with 125 (81.7%) unresolved at the end of the index procedure. The most frequent complications were side branch occlusion or slow flow and distal slow reflow. Among patients with unresolved complications, the 2-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, or stroke) was similar between ICR and SCR (10.6% vs. 17.2%; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.22-1.52; p = 0.27). Independent predictors of procedural complications were complex culprit lesion morphology (class B2/C) (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.07-2.63; p = 0.023) and STEMI presentation (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.00-2.11; p = 0.049).
Conclusions:
In patients with unresolved culprit lesion complications during index PCI, ICR showed comparable 2-year outcomes to the staged approach. Complex lesion morphology and STEMI presentation independently predicted procedural complications. These findings suggest that ICR remains a safe and viable strategy in hemodynamically stable patients, even in the presence of procedural challenges.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies