Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Recommendations for the use of clinical outcome assessments in rare disease drug development
Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi1,2,3,4,5,6, Noleen K McCorry7,8, Melanie J Calvert1,2,3,4,5,6
1Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Department of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract:
There are over 10,000 rare diseases collectively affecting an estimated 250-450 million people globally. While these diseases are rare individually, their cumulative impact on patients, families, healthcare systems, and society is substantial. The incorporation of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) in clinical trials can facilitate patient-focused drug development and treatment evaluation by generating meaningful evidence on how patients feel and function. This work was conducted in three phases: a targeted literature review (searched Aug 2025; updated Feb 2026), a multistakeholder workshop (online, Sept 2025) and, finally, an online survey to ratify final recommendations (responses by March 3, 2026). Of 43 individuals invited, 35 (81%) attended the virtual workshop: 11 researchers (including clinical trialists); 12 patients/caregivers; seven industry experts; four individuals from regulatory agencies and one HTA expert. All were based in the UK or USA. Across three sessions, the workshop explored stakeholder perspectives on considerations and appropriate methodological approaches to COA assessment for rare disease drug development to facilitate the generation of recommendations for future use. A threshold of at least 70% votes was chosen, a priori, for inclusion in the final set of recommendations. Here, we describe the potential benefits of COAs, summarise the key challenges, and provide recommendations to facilitate their effective and consistent integration in drug development for rare diseases.
Insights
Clinical outcome assessments (COAs) improve rare disease drug development by capturing patient experiences. This study outlines recommendations for their effective integration in clinical trials for rare conditions.
Area of Science:
- Medical Research
- Clinical Trials
- Drug Development
Background:
- Over 10,000 rare diseases affect 250-450 million people globally.
- Rare diseases have a substantial cumulative impact on patients, families, and healthcare systems.
- Clinical outcome assessments (COAs) are crucial for patient-focused drug development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore stakeholder perspectives on COA assessment in rare disease drug development.
- To generate recommendations for the effective and consistent integration of COAs.
- To facilitate patient-focused drug development and treatment evaluation.
Main Methods:
- A three-phase approach: literature review, multistakeholder workshop, and online survey.
- Workshop included researchers, patients/caregivers, industry experts, and regulatory/HTA representatives.
- Recommendations required at least 70% agreement from participants.
Main Results:
- Identified benefits and challenges of using COAs in rare disease drug development.
- Gathered diverse stakeholder perspectives on COA methodological approaches.
- Developed a consensus-based set of recommendations for COA integration.
Conclusions:
- COAs are vital for generating evidence on patient-reported outcomes in rare diseases.
- Effective integration of COAs requires addressing methodological challenges.
- Recommendations aim to enhance the consistency and utility of COAs in rare disease drug development.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Drug Discovery: Overview
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
