Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018
Dose calculation errors for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans of various complexity
Emmanouil Terzidis1, Fredrik Nordström2, Magnus Gustafsson3
1Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Department of Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. emmanouil.terzidis@gu.se.
Dose calculation errors in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans can be significant, especially in organs of interest outside the planning target volume (PTV). Variations between calculation methods highlight the challenges of complex VMAT dose accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy Treatment Planning
Background:
- Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans often feature complex beam apertures, challenging accurate dose calculations.
- Assessing dose calculation accuracy is crucial for ensuring effective and safe radiotherapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate potential dose calculation errors in VMAT plans across varying complexity levels.
- To compare the performance of six different dose calculation methods for VMAT.
Main Methods:
- Sixty VMAT plans from twenty patient cases with differing complexities were analyzed.
- Six distinct dose calculation algorithms were employed for each plan.
- Three-dimensional dose distributions were evaluated using voxel-wise standard deviations (2SDs), focusing on 2SDMean and 2SD2cc metrics.
Main Results:
- Higher dose calculation variations (2SD values) were observed outside the planning target volume (PTV), particularly in low-dose and buildup regions.
- Average 2SDMean/2SD2cc values within the PTV were 0.9-1.2%/1.8-5.1%, increasing to 1.8-3.1%/8.4-18.7% in regions 1 cm outside the PTV.
- Organs at risk showed larger variations than PTVs, with up to 5%/15% differences noted for prostate cases.
Conclusions:
- Dose calculation method variations were more pronounced in organs of interest compared to PTVs.
- Patient-specific case differences in dose calculation variability exceeded differences attributed to plan complexity levels.
Related Concept Videos
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods
Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose
Fixed-dose regimens can be used for various routes of administration, including intravenous (IV) injections and oral medications. For IV administration, a predetermined amount of the drug is...
Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations

