Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Revascularization of coronary artery disease in heart failure. A European Journal of Heart Failure Expert Consensus
Bernhard Haring1,2,3, Antonio Iaconelli4,5, Divaka Perera6,7
1Department of Medicine IV, Clinic Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
Insights
Myocardial revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery) offers no benefit for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients on modern therapy. Revascularization decisions require heart team discussion due to conflicting evidence.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- The role of myocardial revascularization, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), in heart failure (HF) patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains controversial.
- Historically, CABG showed modest long-term benefits over medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) prior to recent pharmacological advances.
- Current evidence indicates revascularization provides no benefit in HFrEF patients managed with modern medical therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify the current role and indications for myocardial revascularization in patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of PCI versus CABG in the context of contemporary heart failure treatments.
- To provide guidance on decision-making processes for revascularization in complex HF/CAD cases.
Main Methods:
- Review and synthesis of existing evidence regarding myocardial revascularization strategies in heart failure patients.
- Analysis of outcomes based on different revascularization procedures (PCI vs. CABG) and medical therapies.
- Consideration of patient selection strategies, including viability and ischemia-guided approaches.
Main Results:
- Revascularization offers no survival or symptomatic benefit for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients receiving guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT).
- Evidence supporting viability or ischemia-guided selection for revascularization in HF patients is controversial.
- Optimizing GDMT and device therapy is paramount for all HF patients.
Conclusions:
- The decision for revascularization in HF patients with CAD should be individualized and discussed by a heart team, considering limited and conflicting evidence.
- Revascularization is not indicated when HF symptoms persist despite optimal GDMT and device therapy.
- Consider revascularization only when angina persists despite GDMT and device therapy, with procedure choice based on symptoms, ischemic burden, surgical risk, and coronary anatomy.
Abstract:
The role of myocardial revascularization in HF patients with coronary artery disease by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is controversial. For patients with HFrEF, prior to the advances in pharmacological heart failure therapy over the last 10 years, evidence suggests a modest, long-term benefit of CABG over guideline-recommended medical therapy. In the era of modern medical therapy, revascularization had no benefit in HFrEF. Whether a patient with HF and CAD should be advised to have revascularization and, if so, which procedure remains unclear and should be discussed by the heart team given the limited and conflicting evidence. Evidence for viability or ischaemia-guided selection strategies is controversial. In all cases with HF, establishing and optimizing GDMT and device therapy is required. When HF symptoms dominate despite GDMT, additional invasive procedures are not indicated. When angina persists despite GDMT and device therapy, revascularization should be considered. The choice of revascularization procedure should be discussed in the heart team, considering symptoms and ischemic burden, surgical risk, coronary complexity and the applicable HF treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations