Favorable Changes in Basic Functional Status and Mobility After Participation in a Community-Based Day Center Program...

Introduction: Community-based day center programs may support healthy ageing by promoting functional ability, mental well-being, and social participation among older adults, but real-world evidence from Latin America remains limited. Objective: We aimed to examine changes in functional status, mental health, and quality of life among older adults participating in the CEDIAM program in the Maule Region of Chile in 2022 and 2023. Methods: Pre-post observational study using routinely collected data from 15 CEDIAM centers. The 2022 and 2023 datasets were analyzed as independent cohorts. Functional status was assessed with the Barthel Index, the Lawton and Brody scale, and the Timed Up and Go test; mental health with the Mini-Mental State Examination and the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale; and quality of life with the EuroQol-5D visual analogue scale. Paired comparisons, category-transition analyses, and multivariable logistic regression models of improvement were performed. Results: Baseline samples included 894 participants in 2022 and 897 in 2023. In 2022, all continuous outcomes improved significantly (all p ≤ 0.001). In 2023, the Barthel Index, the Timed Up and Go test, and the Geriatric Depression Scale improved (all p < 0.0001), and the EuroQol-5D visual analogue scale also improved (p < 0.01), whereas the Lawton and Brody scale (p = 0.204) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (p = 0.725) did not. Category-transition analyses showed significant improvements in basic activities of daily living and mobility in both cohorts (both p < 0.001), while significant categorical changes in instrumental activities of daily living, global cognition, depressive symptoms, and self-rated quality of life were observed only in 2022 (all p ≤ 0.01). Rural residence was associated with higher odds of improvement in basic activities of daily living (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.17-2.25; p = 0.004), whereas age ≥75 years was associated with lower odds of improvement in depressive symptoms (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.76; p < 0.001) and self-rated quality of life (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.94; p = 0.023). Conclusions: Participation in CEDIAM was associated with favorable changes, particularly in basic functional status and mobility, although responses varied across outcomes and participant subgroups.