Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

11:12
Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
Published on: September 18, 2012
Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation in Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury
Aimy Vadeboncoeur1, Chelsey Lai Kwan1, Ada Mocanu1
1School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, 3654 Prom Sir-William-Osler, Montreal, QC H3G 1Y5, Canada.
Journal of Eye Movement Research
|July 24, 2026
Summary
The Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation (ROSE) effectively identifies oculomotor dysfunction in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). This validated tool shows significant differences in mTBI patients compared to neurotypical individuals.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Ophthalmology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) frequently cause oculomotor dysfunctions, impairing daily activities.
- Existing clinical screening tools for TBI-related oculomotor issues are insufficient.
- The Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation (ROSE) was developed to address this gap.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the Rehabilitation Oculomotor Screening Evaluation (ROSE) specifically in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).
- To assess the efficacy of ROSE in detecting oculomotor dysfunction post-TBI.
Main Methods:
- Participants with TBI (n=25) and neurotypical controls (n=24) were recruited.
- The TBI group completed ROSE, alongside scales for balance (SOT), daily function (RNLI), mobility (TUG), and visual vertigo.
- Neurotypical participants completed only ROSE for comparative analysis.
Main Results:
- Individuals with mTBI demonstrated significantly higher ROSE scores than neurotypical controls, indicating greater oculomotor dysfunction.
- A large effect size was observed, underscoring the robustness of the finding.
- ROSE scores correlated significantly with the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI), suggesting functional relevance.
Conclusions:
- The significant differences in ROSE scores between groups confirm its validity for detecting oculomotor dysfunction in TBI.
- The association with RNLI scores highlights the clinical utility of ROSE in assessing functional impact.
- Further validation in larger and diverse neurological populations is recommended.
