Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Development of a Novel Internal Fixation Model for Rat Radial Fractures: Fracture Healing Assessment and Dorsal Root Ganglion Isolation
Published on: March 13, 2026
Trends in the management of type I and type II open forearm fractures in children
Kian Niknam1, Emma D Grellinger1, Nikit Venishetty2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Insights
Operative and nonoperative management of pediatric open forearm fractures show similar infection rates. However, operative treatment is significantly more expensive, with no change in management trends observed.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Orthopedics
- Trauma Surgery
- Health Economics
Background:
- Open forearm fractures (FFs) are common pediatric injuries with varied treatment approaches.
- Management strategies include operative and nonoperative debridement.
- Understanding trends and outcomes is crucial for optimizing care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess management trends for type I and II open forearm fractures in pediatric patients.
- To compare infection rates between operative and nonoperative management.
- To determine cost differences between the two management strategies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System database (2018-2022).
- Inclusion criteria: patients aged 16 or younger with open forearm fractures.
- Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, t-tests, linear, and logistic regression.
Main Results:
- 73% of 3279 patients underwent operative irrigation and debridement (I&D); 27% were treated nonoperatively.
- No significant trend in management over the study period.
- Infection rates were similar between operative and nonoperative I&D (OR: 1.10, P=0.74).
- Operative management was significantly more expensive ($13,132 vs. $2,930, P<0.01).
Conclusions:
- Management of pediatric open forearm fractures has not significantly changed over the past 5 years.
- Operative and nonoperative I&D yield comparable infection rates.
- Operative management incurs substantially higher costs without a demonstrable benefit in infection control.
Abstract:
Open forearm fractures (FFs) are common injuries in pediatric patients with variable management, including operative and nonoperative debridement. In this study, we aim to assess trends in management and determine differences in infection rates and costs between operative and nonoperative management for type I and II open both-bone forearm fractures in pediatric patients. This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Pediatric Health Information System database. Patients were included if they were aged 16 or younger and had open forearm fractures between 2018 and 2022. Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, t -tests, linear regression, and logistic regression were used to assess associations between operative and nonoperative management, infection rates, and costs. A total of 3279 patients were included in this study. Approximately 73% of patients were treated with an operative irrigation and debridement (I&D), and 27% of patients were treated nonoperatively. There was no significant trend in management over the study period ( P = 0.91). Non-White patients and younger patients were more likely to be treated nonoperatively ( P < 0.01). The rate of infection was 2.2% and increased over time ( P = 0.03). There was no difference in infection between operative and nonoperative I&D (odds ratio: 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.63-1.94, P = 0.74). However, operative management was significantly more expensive ($13 132 vs. $2930; P < 0.01). There has been no significant change in the management of types I and II open forearm fractures over the past 5 years. While there is no significant difference in the infection rate between patients treated operatively and nonoperatively, operative management is significantly more expensive.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III.
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
