Related Experiment Videos
Finite-Gain Prescribed-Time-Synchronized Formation Control for ASVs Under Output Constraints
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
|July 24, 2026
Summary
This study introduces prescribed-time-synchronized (PTS) formation control for autonomous surface vehicles (ASVs) with time-varying constraints. The novel method ensures stable formation convergence within a set time, maintaining finite gains and satisfying all constraints.
Area of Science:
- Robotics and Control Systems
- Marine Engineering
- Applied Mathematics
Background:
- Autonomous surface vehicles (ASVs) require robust formation control strategies.
- Existing methods often struggle with time-varying output constraints and achieving rapid convergence.
- Prescribed-time control offers a way to guarantee convergence within a finite, user-defined time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a prescribed-time-synchronized (PTS) formation control strategy for multiple ASVs.
- To address challenges posed by time-varying output constraints.
- To ensure stable convergence within a specified time frame with finite gains.
Main Methods:
- Establishment of a novel prescribed-time stability lemma.
- Development of a PTS constrained stable system (PTSCSS) using finite-gain adjustment functions.
- Design of a PTSCSS-based sliding manifold and finite-gain sliding-mode controller.
- Rigorous stability proof using Lyapunov analysis.
Main Results:
- The proposed PTSCSS ensures simultaneous state convergence to the origin within the prescribed time.
- Finite gains are maintained throughout the control process.
- Time-varying constraints are strictly satisfied after a designated switching instant.
- Comparative simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of the control method.
Conclusions:
- The developed PTS formation control strategy effectively manages ASVs under time-varying constraints.
- The method guarantees convergence within a prescribed time with enhanced stability properties.
- This research advances the capabilities of coordinated control for multi-ASV systems.
Related Concept Videos
Load-frequency control
Load-frequency control (LFC) is vital for maintaining power system stability, ensuring that frequency and power flows remain within acceptable limits during load changes. Turbine-governor control eliminates rotor accelerations and decelerations following load changes. However, a steady-state frequency error persists when the change in the turbine-governor reference setting is zero. In an interconnected power system, each area agrees to export or import a scheduled amount of power through...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers are widely used in control systems to improve stability and reduce steady-state errors. A dimmer switch controlling the brightness of a light bulb serves as a practical example of phase-lag control, gradually adjusting the bulb's brightness. Mathematically, phase-lag control or low-pass filtering is represented when the factor 'a' is less than 1.
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any finite,...
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any finite,...
Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers
Understanding the working function of different types of controllers can be illustrated with practical analogies, such as adjusting a stereo's volume equalizer. Cranking up the bass involves a phase-lead controller, which functions as a high-pass filter, while increasing the treble uses a phase-lag controller, which acts as a low-pass filter. PD controllers, similar to high-pass filters, enhance the system's response to high-frequency components. PI controllers, akin to low-pass filters, manage...
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control
Phase-lead controllers are commonly used in various control systems to enhance response speed and stability. Adjusting the brightness on a television screen offers a practical example of phase-lead control. When contrast is enhanced, a phase-lead controller is employed. Mathematically, phase-lead control is identified when the first parameter is smaller than the second.
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
Transformers with Off-Nominal Turns Ratios
In scenarios involving parallel transformers with disparate ratings, developing per-unit models requires accommodating off-nominal turns ratios. This situation arises when the selected base voltages are not proportional to the transformer’s voltage ratings. Consider a transformer where the rated voltages are related by the term a. If the chosen voltage bases satisfy a relationship involving term b, term c is defined as the ratio of these bases. This ratio is then substituted into the rated...