Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
Systemic Ama assessment and Clinical Disease Activity in patients with Amavata (Rheumatoid arthritis)
Shrikant Wagh1, Vinayak Joshi1, Ashwinikumar A Raut2
1Dept of Rognidan & Vikruti-vigyan, Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Ayurveda and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, 411018, India.
None:
Objective assessment of disease severity is necessary during management and clinical studies of Amavata. Various validated instruments are available for measuring disease activity in Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A validated instrument for systemic Ama assessment in Amavata (RA) measures Ama, but does not determine the disease activity in these cases. The Ama-score did not correlate well with the disease activity score (DAS) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). We, therefore, used another composite score, viz. Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) to assess its correlation with the Ama-score in patients with Amavata (RA). To evaluate the correlation between the Ama-score and CDAI in patients with Amavata (RA). CDAI and Ama-score were evaluated in two groups of patients with amavata (RA), Group A: treatment-naive patients (n = 13) and Group B: patients on treatment (n = 25) who are in remission. Ama-score was also assessed in apparently healthy volunteers without any overt symptoms, particularly gastrointestinal (Group C; n = 20). Spearman Rank Correlation was used for correlation between variables. Mann-Whitney U Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test were used for inter-group comparison. P value < 0.05 was considered significant. The median Ama-score and CDAI in Group A were 44 (12-76.5) and 32 (24-43), and those in Group B were 2 (0-22) and 0 (0-2), respectively. The difference in the Ama-score (P = < 0.0001) and CDAI (P = < 0.0001) between Groups A and B is significant. There was no significant difference between Group B and Group C (P > 0.05). There is a significant correlation between Ama-score and CDAI in these subjects (Spearman r 0.6447, P < 0.0001; 95 % CI 0.4012-0.8031). There is a good correlation between ama-score and CDAI. Ama-score and CDAI with additional joint assessment can be combined to develop an objective Ayurvedic tool that can be used for patient management and reporting clinical studies in amavata (RA).
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment