Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Assessing Cerebral Autoregulation via Oscillatory Lower Body Negative Pressure and Projection Pursuit Regression
Published on: December 10, 2014
Validity, tolerability, and feasibility of automated arterial occlusion pressure across body positions
Jinghui Yang1, Taylor Gubler1, Elizabeth Kenneally1
1Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT, United States of America.
Abstract:
Objective. Accurate arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) measurement is essential for individualized blood flow restriction (BFR) prescription, but no automated BFR device has been validated across the range of body positions commonly used in practice. This study evaluated the validity, tolerability, and feasibility of automated algorithm-based AOP measurement compared to pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound across supine, seated, and standing positions.Approach. Forty-six healthy adults completed AOP measurements on the dominant lower limb using both automated and Doppler ultrasound methods at three body positions in randomized order. Validity was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and proportional bias testing. Tolerability was evaluated through measurement duration, pain perception (0-10), and adverse event surveillance. Feasibility was assessed by the first-attempt success rate.Main results. The automated method demonstrated good agreement with Doppler ultrasound in supine (ICC = 0.76), seated (ICC = 0.87), and standing (ICC = 0.83) positions. However, 95% limits of agreement ranged from -38 to +48 mmHg across positions, and a significant negative proportional bias was observed in supine (p= 0.031). Automated measurements required significantly longer duration than Doppler across all positions (p< 0.001), while pain perception was comparable between methods. A single participant withdrew during standing automated measurement due to intolerable pain. The first-attempt success rate was significantly lower for automated measurement in standing compared to Doppler (87% vs 100%,p= 0.041) but comparable in supine and seated.Significance. The automated device demonstrates good validity and acceptable tolerability for AOP assessment in healthy young adults during seated and standing positions. Clinicians should consider manual ultrasound verification for supine measurements or when prescribing high-percentage AOP protocols, and provide postural support during standing measurements to improve first-attempt success.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...

