Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
Published on: January 10, 2025
Pharmacist decision-making in clinical calculations using binary sex variables for transgender patients
Jessica Sinclair1, Kaitlyn Pierson1, Kayla R Joyner1
1Shenandoah University Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy.
Background:
Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals may experience physiologic changes from gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) that complicate clinical calculations with binary sex variables. Common tools such as the Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CrCl) equation and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease pooled cohort equations (ACC/AHA ASCVD PCE) require binary sex inputs; however, no national or international guidelines specify whether sex assigned at birth or gender identity should be used when completing these clinical calculations that have binary sex inputs.
Objectives:
To evaluate (1) pharmacists' practices and confidence in using sex assigned at birth versus gender identity when calculating CrCl with the Cockcroft-Gault equation and ASCVD risk with the ACC/AHA ASCVD PCE in TGD patients and (2) the effects of GAHT on these decisions.
Methods:
This IRB-approved, cross-sectional survey of licensed pharmacists (October 2024-February 2025) assessed clinical decision-making in transfeminine and transmasculine patients with and without long-established GAHT, as well as confidence and prior training. Paired comparisons were analyzed using McNemar's test to test for the effects of GAHT on these decisions.
Results:
A total of 190 pharmacists completed the survey. Most respondents selected sex assigned at birth for calculating CrCl using the Cockcroft-Gault equation and ACC/AHA ASCVD PCE in patients not receiving GAHT (85.2-85.4%). In patients with long-established GAHT, there was a consistent and statistically significant shift away from using sex assigned at birth (p < 0.001) when compared to patients not on long-established GAHT. Confidence was low overall (median 1-2 [IQR 1-3]), and 90% reported no prior training. Training was associated with higher confidence (p < 0.05), but not with consistent decision-making.
Conclusions:
Pharmacists demonstrate inconsistent approaches and low confidence in deciding binary sex inputs in clinical calculations for TGD patients. Decision-making shifts with long-established GAHT and training improves confidence.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
