Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures (IRCP): A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Ultrasound versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Uterine Fibroid Mapping Before Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic
Maeve S McNamara1, Jasmin Darville2, Miranda L M Delawalla3
1Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Atlanta, GA, USA..
Objective:
To (1) characterize the prevalence of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in advance of robotic assisted-laparoscopic myomectomy, (2) investigate the association between pre-operative imaging (US versus MRI) and intraoperative estimates of fibroid size, number, and number multiplied by size (metric estimating fibroid burden) and (3) correlate pre-operative and intraoperative measurement agreement with clinical outcomes.
Study Design:
A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who underwent laparoscopic robotic-assisted myomectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroids at a single institution, by a single surgeon, from 2013-2023.
Setting:
Large southeastern urban academic hospital PATIENTS: 164 patients (Mean age=37.4 ± 4.9, 85.4% non-Hispanic African American) INTERVENTION: ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging in advance of laparoscopic robotic-assisted myomectomy MEASUREMENTS: Individual fibroid type, size, and number were defined according to radiographic and operative reports. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were abstracted. Difference was assessed between pre-operative imaging and operative estimates of fibroid number, size, and burden of all fibroids in the cohort; results were stratified by anatomical type of fibroid.
Main Results:
Combined US/MRI (n=67, 40.9%) and MRI-only (n=69, 42.1%) were utilized for pre-operative fibroid mapping by imaging most frequently. MRI tended to underestimate, and US tended to overestimate the number of submucosal fibroids relative to operative findings (US: M=-0.1, SD=0.5; MRI: M=0.9, SD=1.3; p=0.014). Additionally, MRI underestimated, and US overestimated the size (in cm) of subserosal fibroids relative to operative findings (US: M=-1.4, SD=3.0; MRI: M=0.4, SD=3.0; p=0.008). Of the post-operative complications evaluated, only cell salvage had a statistically significant difference; a greater discrepancy between MRI and operative estimates of subserosal fibroid size was associated with greater volume of perioperative cell salvage (low: M=103.1, SD=169.2; high: M=187.5, SD=224.2; p=0.046).
Conclusion:
Among patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted robotic myomectomy, this pilot study observed that MRI tended to underestimate and US tended to overestimate the number of submucosal and size of subserosal fibroids relative to intraoperative estimates.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
