Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Ultra-Fast Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Cost-effectiveness analysis of molecular reflex testing-based targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer from a
Leonie Schumacher1, Melina Sophie Kurte2, Tabea Poos2
1VITIS Healthcare Group, Cologne, Germany. l.schumacher@vitis-healthcare.com.
Background:
Reflex testing (RT) - pathologist-initiated molecular testing performed at non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosis - enables rapid identification of actionable genomic alterations for targeted therapy (TT) selection. Despite national and international guideline recommendations, approximately 15% of patients with advanced NSCLC in Germany remain untested for driver mutations. The portion of untested patients in early stages is likely to be even higher.
Objective:
This study simulated the clinical and economic impact of introducing RT for untested NSCLC patients under different implementation scenarios, using a decision-tree model from the German statutory health insurance (SHI) perspective.
Methods:
A decision-tree model simulated four RT cases (C): (C1) no molecular testing, (C2) testing per German S3 guideline recommendations, (C3) testing according to current TT approvals, and (C4) comprehensive panel testing (standard in Austria). PD-L1 expression was tested in all cases. The untested NSCLC population was projected for 2025 based on SHI demographics. Model inputs comprised RT sensitivity, mutation and stage distribution, drug acquisition costs (Lauer-Taxe, April 2025), and median overall/progression-free survival (mOS/mPFS) per therapeutic strategy. A scenario analysis was conducted assuming NGS test costs of €3,000 per panel to assess their potential influence on cost-effectiveness versus no testing.
Results:
All RT cases (C2-C4) substantially increased actionable mutation detection, enabling earlier TT initiation and lower mean treatment costs versus no molecular testing. C2-C4 were clinically dominant, driven by increased mOS by 5.48-5.47 months and mPFS by 4.89-5.42 months. Model yielded annual cost savings versus no testing of €740 (C2) and €535 (C3/C4) per patient (annual cost savings of €1,175 - €1,621 per life-year gained). When €3,000 next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel costs were included, annual costs per patient increased modestly (C2: €2,260; C3/C4: €2,465 versus no testing), at annual incremental costs of €4,946 - €5,409 per life-year gained.
Conclusions:
Reflex testing across implementation cases, by enabling earlier identification of actionable biomarkers and receipt of matched targeted therapy, improves clinical outcomes and is cost-effective for untested NSCLC patients from the German SHI perspective. Structured initiatives, such as national Network for Genomic Medicine (nNGM), could further expand equitable access to precision oncology in Germany.
Insights
Reflex testing for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) significantly improves patient outcomes and is cost-effective. This molecular testing strategy enables earlier targeted therapy selection, leading to better survival and reduced healthcare costs for patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Health Economics
Background:
- Reflex testing (RT) identifies actionable genomic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for targeted therapy (TT) selection.
- Despite guidelines, ~15% of advanced NSCLC patients in Germany lack driver mutation testing, with higher rates in early stages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To simulate the clinical and economic impact of implementing RT for untested NSCLC patients in Germany.
- To evaluate different RT implementation scenarios from a statutory health insurance (SHI) perspective.
Main Methods:
- A decision-tree model compared four scenarios: no testing, guideline-based testing, current TT approval-based testing, and comprehensive panel testing.
- Projected untested NSCLC population for 2025 using SHI demographics.
- Incorporated RT sensitivity, mutation/stage distribution, drug costs, and survival data; analyzed NGS panel costs (€3,000).
Main Results:
- RT scenarios (guideline, TT approval, panel) increased actionable mutation detection and enabled earlier TT initiation.
- All RT scenarios were clinically dominant, improving median overall survival by 5.47-5.48 months and progression-free survival by 4.89-5.42 months.
- RT yielded annual cost savings of €535-€740 per patient versus no testing; incremental costs per life-year gained ranged from €4,946-€5,409 with €3,000 NGS panel costs.
Conclusions:
- Reflex testing improves clinical outcomes and is cost-effective for untested NSCLC patients in Germany.
- Earlier biomarker identification and targeted therapy improve outcomes.
- Initiatives like the national Network for Genomic Medicine (nNGM) can enhance access to precision oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase