Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement from Autologous Pericardium with a Self-Expandable Nitinol Stent in an Adult Sheep Model
Published on: June 8, 2022
Clinical outcomes of injectable and conventional pulmonary valve replacement in severe pulmonary regurgitation
Sercan Tak1, Murat Koç2, Ali Kutsal3
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkiye.
Insights
Injectable pulmonary valve replacement in pediatric patients shows favorable early outcomes and comparable long-term function to conventional methods. This less invasive approach offers a safe alternative for managing pulmonary regurgitation after tetralogy of Fallot repair.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Pulmonary regurgitation is a common complication after tetralogy of Fallot repair, often necessitating pulmonary valve replacement.
- Injectable bioprosthetic valves present a less invasive option compared to traditional surgical valve replacement.
- Limited comparative data exists for injectable valves in pediatric populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the short-term and long-term clinical outcomes of injectable pulmonary valve replacement versus conventional pulmonary valve replacement.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of injectable pulmonary valve replacement in pediatric patients with severe pulmonary regurgitation post-tetralogy of Fallot repair.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 22 pediatric patients undergoing pulmonary valve replacement.
- Patients were stratified into two groups: injectable (n=9) and conventional (n=13).
- Outcomes assessed included early postoperative parameters and long-term valve function over a mean follow-up of 10.5 years.
Main Results:
- The injectable group demonstrated significantly shorter ICU stays, reduced mechanical ventilation duration, less chest tube drainage, and shorter hospital stays.
- Both groups exhibited similar long-term valve function and right ventricular remodeling.
- Excellent freedom from reintervention (100%) was observed in both cohorts during the follow-up period.
Conclusions:
- Injectable pulmonary valve replacement is a safe alternative for pediatric patients with pulmonary regurgitation post-tetralogy of Fallot repair.
- It offers favorable early outcomes and long-term valve performance comparable to conventional surgical replacement.
- Optimal results depend on clinical experience and precise patient selection.
Background/Aim:
Pulmonary regurgitation following tetralogy of Fallot repair is a common long-term complication requiring pulmonary valve replacement. Injectable bioprosthetic valves offer a less invasive alternative to conventional surgical replacement, but comparative data in pediatric populations remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate short-term and long-term clinical outcomes of injectable pulmonary valve replacement and conventional pulmonary valve replacement in pediatric patients with severe pulmonary regurgitation following tetralogy of Fallot repair.
Materials And Methods:
This retrospective study included 22 pediatric patients who underwent pulmonary valve replacement. Patients were divided into injectable (n = 9) and conventional (n = 13) groups based on anatomical criteria. Primary outcomes included early postoperative parameters and long-term valve function. The mean follow-up duration was 10.5 ± 2.5 years.
Results:
Favorable early outcomes were noted in the injectable pulmonary valve replacement cohort, including shorter intensive care unit stay (16.8 ± 6.2 vs. 37.0 ± 23.4 h, p = 0.021), reduced mechanical ventilation duration (5.2 ± 3.9 vs. 15.4 ± 11.4 h, p = 0.019), decreased chest tube drainage (206.7 ± 108.2 vs. 513.1 ± 274.1 mL, p = 0.005), and shorter hospital stay (5.4 ± 2.4 vs. 8.4 ± 3.1 days, p = 0.026). Long-term outcomes indicated similar valve function and right ventricular remodeling in the two groups, with excellent freedom from reintervention (100%) during follow-up.
Conclusion:
Injectable pulmonary valve replacement appears to be a safe alternative, offering favorable early outcomes and long-term valve performance comparable to conventional methods. However, clinical experience and precise patient selection remain critical for achieving optimal results.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

