Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Preventing children's care entry: an umbrella review of the risks, protective factors, and interventions
Mark Rodgers1, Yanhua Chen2, Davara Bennett2
1Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Insights
Preventing children
Area of Science:
- Child Welfare Research
- Public Health Policy
- Social Work Interventions
Background:
- Existing reviews document factors influencing children's entry/re-entry into care.
- Limited attention has been given to intervention literature and synthesizing evidence.
- Need for a comprehensive overview of risk/protective factors and interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and synthesize evidence on risk/protective factors and interventions for preventing care entry/re-entry.
- To identify potential policy intervention points for child welfare.
- To provide an overview of systematic reviews on children's care.
- To synthesize evidence on interventions for children's care entry/re-entry.
Main Methods:
- Systematic overview of reviews published since 2013 in high-income countries.
- Duplicate data extraction and AMSTAR-2 for quality appraisal.
- Narrative synthesis categorizing factors using the Dahlgren-Whitehead model.
Main Results:
- 33 systematic reviews included: 15 on risk/protective factors, 18 on interventions.
- Modifiable factors include individual (maternal mental health), social (support, maltreatment), and living conditions (socioeconomic).
- Intervention evidence is limited/inconsistent; focus is on individual programs, not structural policies.
Conclusions:
- Care entry/re-entry factors are multifaceted, involving complex interactions.
- Robust evaluations of context-specific policies are needed.
- Improved understanding and outcomes for children and families require better intervention research.
Background:
Existing reviews have documented a range of factors associated with care entry or re-entry for children, with much less attention given to the intervention literature. In addition, there has been no systematic attempt to bring these two bodies of evidence together. In this overview of systematic reviews we aimed to identify and synthesise evidence on both risk/protective factors and interventions for preventing care entry/re-entry and to identify potential entry points for policy intervention.
Methods:
We identified systematic reviews related to children's care entry/re-entry, in high-income countries, published since 2013. Selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate, and AMSTAR-2 was used to appraise review quality. We combined findings using narrative synthesis, categorising factors into non-modifiable or modifiable (using the Dahlgren-Whitehead model of health determinants), and linking interventions with these factors where appropriate.
Results:
Of the 33 systematic reviews included, 15 focused on risk/protective factors and 18 on interventions. Modifiable factors and related interventions were categorised into individual and lifestyle factors (maternal mental ill-health/substance misuse, child health), social and community factors (social support, child maltreatment), and living and working conditions (socioeconomic and service-level factors). This overview highlighted the multifaceted risk and protective factors associated with children's entry and re-entry into care, and the interacting and cumulative effect of risk factors. Reviews on the effectiveness of interventions reported limited or inconsistent evidence, often due to different study designs (experimental vs observational), small numbers of included primary studies, or the heterogeneity of interventions. Individual programmes rather than structural policies tended to be the focus in reviews, and most programmes were conducted in the US.
Conclusions:
Factors associated with care entry/re-entry are multifaceted and involve complex interactions between upstream and downstream drivers. A range of interventions have been evaluated, but robust evaluations of interventions focusing on context-specific policies are needed to better understand and improve outcomes for children and families.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Relationship with Parents: Attachment
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Stella Chess...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Parenting Styles
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative Parenting
This...
