Economic Burden and Cost Differences Between Branded and Generic Topical Antifungals in India

Prateek Dt1, Kavitha Dongerkery1, Pradnya Deolekar1

  • 1Pharmacology, DY Patil University, School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, IND.

Cureus
|July 25, 2026
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Topical antifungal drug prices in India vary significantly, with some products showing over 8000% cost variation. Pharmacoeconomic analysis highlights the need for cost-effective strategies in treating superficial mycoses.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacoeconomics
  • Dermatology
  • Pharmaceutical Market Analysis

Background:

  • Superficial mycoses (SFMs) represent a significant public health and economic burden in India, necessitating prolonged treatment due to high recurrence rates.
  • The Indian pharmaceutical market features a wide range of generic and branded drugs for SFMs, leading to considerable price disparities.
  • A pharmacoeconomic analysis is essential to guide cost-effective prescribing and resource allocation for topical antifungals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a pharmacoeconomic analysis comparing the prices of generic and branded topical antifungal medications in India.
  • To quantify the percentage cost variation (PCV) among different topical antifungal brands and dosage forms.
  • To identify specific topical antifungal agents with the highest and lowest cost variations.

Main Methods:

  • Price data for topical antifungal medications were collected from the "Monthly Index of Medical Specialties" (August-October 2025), an online pharmacy, and the Jan Aushadhi website.
  • Total expenses for 30 mL and 30 g dosage forms (cream, ointment, lotion, eye drops, shampoo) were calculated for each drug brand.
  • Cost ratios and PCV were analyzed, using generic medicine prices from the Jan Aushadhi website as the baseline.

Main Results:

  • Significant price variations were observed across different brands of topical antifungals. Itraconazole 1% ointment exhibited the highest cost variation (8335.1%), followed by clotrimazole dusting powder (4740%).
  • Comparison between generic and branded topical antifungals revealed the highest variation for clotrimazole 1% cream (3431.7%) and the least for ketoconazole 2% powder (135.4%).
  • Combination topical antifungals showed substantial price differences, with one formulation reaching 1479.4% variation.

Conclusions:

  • The topical antifungal market in India is characterized by substantial price variability.
  • Collaboration among regulatory authorities, manufacturers, and clinicians is crucial for reducing drug costs.
  • Implementing cost regulation policies and promoting clinician awareness of cost-effective therapies are essential for optimizing antifungal treatment.

Related Concept Videos

Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence01:22

Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

Generic intravenous (IV) drugs are considered bioequivalent to their branded counterparts due to their 100% bioavailability upon administration. However, variations in stability among different drug products can significantly influence their therapeutic performance, even if they are pharmaceutically equivalent.Cefuroxime, a prophylactic antimicrobial, is often used as a single-dose IV injection for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. A 3 g dose typically provides...
Antifungal Agents01:15

Antifungal Agents

Amphotericin B is a broad-spectrum antifungal agent that exploits structural differences between fungal and mammalian cell membranes. Its amphipathic structure—featuring a hydrophobic polyene-lactone ring and a hydrophilic region containing mycosamine and carboxylic acid groups—enables selective binding to ergosterol, a sterol predominantly found in fungal plasma membranes. This selective interaction underlies the drug’s antifungal activity, although weak binding to cholesterol contributes to...
Bioequivalence: Overview01:16

Bioequivalence: Overview

Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications01:09

Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each indication due to...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence01:27

Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

Changes in polymorphic forms can significantly influence the bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. Although the FDA defines pharmaceutical equivalence based on having the same active ingredient, dosage form, and route of administration, it does not automatically disqualify products with different polymorphic forms. This means two products with different polymorphs can still be deemed pharmaceutically equivalent. However, polymorphic differences can affect properties like wettability,...
Pharmaceutical Equivalents01:26

Pharmaceutical Equivalents

As defined by regulatory standards, pharmaceutical equivalents require generic drug products to have identical dosage forms and chemically identical active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). They must adhere to compendial or applicable standards for potency, content uniformity, disintegration times, and dissolution rates. In the case of modified-release dosage forms, variations in drug content are permissible as long as the delivered amount remains consistent with the innovator drug product.