Related Experiment Videos
Differences between men and women in guideline-directed medical therapy implementation, tolerability, and outcomes in
M I Wilde1, J J N Krabbe1, L J Bouhuijzen2
1Erasmus MC, Cardiovascular Institute, Thorax Center, Department of Cardiology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) shows similar initiation between men and women. However, women experienced more side effects, while showing improved ejection fraction and reduced mortality risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is established.
- Limited data exist on sex-based differences in real-world GDMT use, tolerability, and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine sex-based differences in contemporary HFrEF patients.
- To compare GDMT implementation, side effects, ejection fraction changes, and clinical outcomes between men and women with HFrEF.
Main Methods:
- Prospective registry (TITRATE-HF) across 48 Dutch hospitals (June 2022-February 2024).
- Analysis of 3,367 HFrEF patients (2,408 men, 959 women).
- Comparison of GDMT (quadruple therapy) uptake, dose achievement, side effects, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) changes, and composite clinical outcomes (HF hospitalization or all-cause death) at 12-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- Quadruple therapy uptake was similar (59.0% men vs. 59.7% women).
- Men more frequently achieved ≥50% of target GDMT doses (16.2% vs. 11.9%).
- Women experienced more side effect-related downgrades for ARB (11.6% vs. 6.9%) and MRA (13.2% vs. 10.4%).
- Women with de novo HFrEF showed greater LVEF improvement (15% vs. 13%).
- Women with chronic HFrEF had a lower risk of composite endpoint (aHR 0.64).
Conclusions:
- GDMT initiation and sequencing were comparable between sexes.
- Differences exist in dose achievement, treatment tolerability, and clinical outcomes.
- Implementation and dosing strategies should consider sex-specific differences in HFrEF management.
Background:
Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is well established, but data on differences between men and women in real-world use, tolerability, and outcomes are limited. We examined these differences in contemporary HFrEF patients.
Methods And Results:
TITRATE-HF is a prospective registry across 48 Dutch hospitals (inclusion June 2022-February 2024), enrolling patients with de novo, chronic, and worsening heart failure (HF). This analysis studied 3,367 HFrEF patients and compared men and women regarding GDMT implementation, side effects, change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and clinical outcomes (composite endpoint: first HF hospitalization or all-cause death). The cohort included 2,408 men (71.5%; 71 years [IQR 63-77]) and 959 women (28.5%; 72 years [IQR 64-79]). At 12-month follow-up, 59.0% of men and 59.7% of women received quadruple therapy (p=0.729). Men more often achieved quadruple therapy at ≥50% of target doses (16.2% versus 11.9%, p=0.004). Compared to men, women experienced more downgrades of ARB (11.6% versus 6.9%, p=0.040) and MRA (13.2% versus 10.4%, p=0.038) due to side effects. In de novo HFrEF, women showed greater LVEF improvement than men (15% versus 13%, p=0.005). In chronic HFrEF, women had lower risk of the composite endpoint compared to men (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.91; p=0.015).
Conclusions:
GDMT initiation and sequencing were comparable between men and women, but differences were observed in dose achievement, treatment tolerability, and clinical outcomes. These findings underscore the need for implementation and dosing strategies that account for differences between men and women.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation