Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Electrophysiological Assessment of Murine Atria with High-Resolution Optical Mapping
Published on: February 22, 2018
Phenomapping in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Implications
Can Hasdemir1, Umut Kocabaş2, Burcu Yağmur3
1Department of Cardiology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.
Background:
Traditional classifications of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) based on cardiac symptomatology, electrocardiographic findings, and reentrant circuits do not capture the full heterogeneity of AVNRT.
Objective:
This study sought to identify distinct phenotypes among patients with AVNRT by using two-step cluster analysis and to determine differential effects of phenotypes on clinical and procedural outcomes.
Methods:
All patients (n = 305) underwent catheter ablation and ajmaline challenge testing. A two-step cluster analysis was conducted using 17 demographic/clinical, anthropometric, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and anatomic variables.
Results:
Three distinct clinically and mechanistically relevant clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (Metabolic/Structural Phenotype, n = 44) patients were characterized by older age of onset of AVNRT (53.5 ± 8.5, 43.5 ± 15, and 24.7 ± 10.5 years, p = 4.9 × 10-31), shorter distance between coronary sinus floor and His bundle potential (22.7 ± 6.1, 24.7 ± 6.8, and 29 ± 7.5 mm, p = 1.3 × 10-7), higher prevalence of "correlated" (diagnosed ≥ 4 years before AVNRT onset) type 2 diabetes (100%, 0%, and 0%, p = 5.9 × 10-67) and "correlated" (diagnosed ≥ 6 years before AVNRT onset) structural heart disease (86.4%, 100%, 0%, p = 3.5 × 10-62) compared to Cluster 2 (Structural Phenotype, n = 78) and Cluster 3 (Anatomic/Genetic Phenotype, n = 183) patients, respectively. Cluster 1 patients had higher prevalence of "pro-arrhythmia" (new-onset and/or symptom worsening/intolerance) with anti-arrhythmic therapy and/or non-cardiac drugs (74.2%, 46.5%, and 31.6%, p = 1.5 × 10-4), AH prolongation/AV-VA block (20.5%, 7.7%, and 2.2%, p = 8.9 × 10-5) and aborted ablation (11.4%, 1.3%, and 0%, p = 8.6 × 10-5) during EP study compared to Clusters 2 and 3 patients, respectively.
Conclusion:
Phenomapping identified three clinically and mechanistically relevant phenotypes of AVNRT associated with clinical and procedural outcomes, underscoring the considerable heterogeneity of AVNRT and the importance of comorbidities and substrates.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Cardiac Action Potential
The cardiac action potential process involves a series of phases characterized by the movement of ions across the cardiac cell membranes, leading to the depolarization and repolarization of the cardiac myocytes.
Ionic Basis of Cardiac Action Potentials
