Evolutionary, Neural, or LLM-Driven Heuristic Generation? A Unified Ant Colony Optimization Benchmark for...

Biomimetic optimization transfers biological information-processing mechanisms into computational systems. Ant colony optimization (ACO) is a canonical example: artificial ants functionally abstract pheromone-mediated stigmergy, decentralized exploration, trail decay through algorithmic evaporation, and adaptive path reinforcement. Building on this functional biological analogue, we present a controlled cross-paradigm evaluation of routing-heuristic generation. A standardized interface embeds human-designed rules, the genetic programming hyper-heuristic GHPP, a resource-constrained DeepACO-MLP proxy, and an offline ReEvo-style proxy into the same ACO solver. The methods are evaluated on held-out TSP and CVRP instances in terms of solution quality, reported generation or training cost, interpretability, and cross-scale behavior under a matched distribution. GHPP yields the shortest routes at all tested scales; the ReEvo-offline proxy and strong human-designed rules generally form a second tier, whereas the resource-constrained neural proxy degrades markedly as problem size increases. These results do not establish an intrinsic ranking of full-capability paradigms. Instead, they show that method selection depends on the operating constraint and on evidence provenance: longer locally measured offline search favors GHPP, while auditable explicit rules characterize the human and ReEvo-offline proxies. By holding the ant-inspired execution mechanism fixed and varying the source of heuristic information, the benchmark clarifies how evolutionary, neural, and LLM-style design strategies interact with a common biomimetic substrate.