Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

04:36
Implantation Protocol of the Foldable Capsular Vitreous Body for Complex Vitreoretinal Surgery
Published on: April 14, 2026
Surgeon Volume and Success Rate in Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Ahmed F Shakarchi1, Muhammad Z Chauhan1, Xiaoran Zhang2
1Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|July 27, 2026
Summary
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) revision was needed in 14.3% of cases. Complex vitrectomy, greater retinal thickness (GRT), and total RD were key predictors, while surgeon volume did not significantly impact revision rates.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal Surgery
Background:
- Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) is a serious ocular condition requiring surgical intervention.
- Understanding factors influencing the success of primary RD repair is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence of revision surgery after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) repair.
- To identify predictors of RD revision in Medicare beneficiaries.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of adult patients undergoing RD repair (scleral buckle and/or vitrectomy) within the Medicare dataset.
- Data included patient demographics, RD characteristics (ICD-10 modifiers), and surgical procedures (CPT codes).
- Surgeon factors analyzed included volume, graduation year, and practice setting; RD revision was defined as repeat surgery within 2 years.
Main Results:
- A total of 25,456 surgeries were analyzed; 14.3% required revision.
- The median time to revision was 73 days.
- Significant predictors for RD revision included greater retinal thickness (GRT), total RD, and complex vitrectomy +/- buckle.
Conclusions:
- The incidence of RD revision was 14.3% among Medicare beneficiaries.
- Complex vitrectomy, GRT, and total RD are associated with an increased risk of revision.
- Surgeon and practice volumes were not found to be significant predictors of RD revision.