Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Colon interposition after esophagectomy: a 15-year single-center experience
Melissa Kemeter1, Lucas Thumfart2, Patrick Heger2
1Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany. melissa@kemeter-online.com.
Background:
Colonic interposition is the preferred option for alimentary tract reconstruction when a gastric conduit pull-up is not feasible. Aim of this study was to evaluate perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing colonic interposition for various indications in our tertiary-care center over a 15-year period.
Methods:
Following institutional board approval, all consecutive patients who underwent colonic interposition for esophageal replacement were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Comprehensive chart review and descriptive statistical analyses were performed.
Results:
Ninety-three patients (62 men, 31 women, median age 65 years, IQR 55.5-72) underwent colonic interposition between January 2009 and December 2023. Benign disease was present in 17.2%, whereas malignancy accounted for 82.8%. A hand-sewn cervical anastomosis was performed in 96.8% of patients. The colonic graft, predominantly based on the left colic artery (89.2%) was routed through the posterior mediastinum in 51.6% and via the retrosternal route in 47.3%. Median operative time was 303 min (IQR 247.5-364). Major complications included anastomotic leakage (28%), anastomotic stenosis (30.1%), pleural empyema (11.8%), and postoperative bleeding (10.8%). The reoperation rate was 38.7%, with a median hospital stay of 29 days (IQR 20-63). In-hospital mortality was 18.3%.
Conclusion:
Colonic interposition after esophagectomy is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in the salvage and secondary reconstruction setting, and should be confined to experienced, high-volume centers.
Clinical Registration Number:
FMS_D_007.23-I-1.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...