Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Percutaneous Contrast Echocardiography-guided Intramyocardial Injection and Cell Delivery in a Large Preclinical Model
Published on: January 21, 2018
Cardio-oncology care in German hospitals: a multicentre inpatient survey of practices, perceptions and guideline gaps
S Poley1, L Payo-Anez1, F M Heidrich2
1Department of Internal Medicine I, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Medical Campus Chemnitz of the TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Background:
Cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT) is a leading non-cancer cause of morbidity and mortality in oncology patients. Implementation of the 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology in German inpatient care remains poorly characterised.
Methods:
Cross-sectional online survey of 1,435 German hospital departments (February-October 2025). Cardiologists, internists, gynaecologists and oncologists answered items on risk stratification, diagnostics, biomarkers, communication and care quality.
Results:
120 physicians responded (cardiologists 36.7%, oncologists 23.3%, gynaecologists 22.5%, internists 17.5%; 73.3% academic/university hospitals). Pre-chemotherapy risk stratification was reported by 85.4% of oncologists and gynaecologists, yet cardiologists were involved in only 28-35%, with heterogeneous risk parameters across specialties. Pre-chemotherapy N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) use ranged from 85.3% (cardiology) to 15.8% (gynaecology; p < 0.001); 52.6% of gynaecologists used no biomarker. In high-risk patients (anthracyclines plus pre-existing heart failure), gynaecologists monitored significantly less than oncologists at every time point, with 12-month surveillance at 5.3% versus 54.2% (p = 0.001); acute cardiac events were the predominant trigger (36.8%), reflecting reactive rather than proactive practice. Cardiological co-management was median 100% (IQR 50-100) in gynaecology versus 70% (IQR 30-100) in oncology. Dedicated cardio-oncology boards existed in only 1.3% of institutions despite > 70% endorsement; median perceived deficit to optimal care was 50-63%. Top-requested interventions were digital risk-stratification tools (up to 81.8%) and interdisciplinary continuing education (up to 72.7%).
Conclusion:
This survey shows that, among participating hospitals, inpatient cardio-oncology care had substantial guideline-practice gaps. Structured solutions were broadly endorsed: digital risk-stratification tools, post-treatment surveillance and cardio-oncology boards are concrete implementation targets.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cancer Survival Analysis
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...