Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026
Symptom Assessment of Patients with Allergic Rhinitis Using an Allergen Exposure Chamber
Published on: March 3, 2023
High-Efficiency Particulate Air Filters to Prevent Winter Respiratory Infections in Care Homes: The AFRI-c Cluster
Alastair D Hay1, Rachel C M Brierley2, Nick Turner2
1Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Importance:
Portable high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters effectively remove airborne microbes.
Objective:
To investigate whether HEPA filters reduce respiratory infection episodes in care home residents.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This 2-arm cluster randomized clinical trial included care homes for older adults in England, with or without nursing and dementia care provision, and capacity for 20 or more residents in individual bedrooms. Data were collected between September 2021 and May 2024, with each care home participating for 1 winter.
Interventions:
Up to 5 HEPA filters for communal areas (clean air delivery rate set at 160 m3/h) and up to 16 filters for bedrooms (clean air delivery rate set at 60 m3/h). Both groups continued usual infection prevention and control measures.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary outcome was respiratory infection rate per winter per bedroom resident (exposed to bedroom and communal room filters). Secondary outcomes included staff absenteeism. All outcomes were also explored for residents exposed only to communal room filters.
Results:
During the study period, 91 care homes were randomized, 47 to receive communal room filters, with 569 bedroom residents (median [IQR] age, 87 [81-92] years; 398 [70.0%] female), and 44 without communal room filters, with 589 residents without bedroom filters (median [IQR] age, 88 [82-92] years; 23 [71.8%] female). There was no evidence of a difference in the number of respiratory infections per winter per intervention vs control bedroom residents (0.99 vs 1.04; adjusted incident rate ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.64-1.33; P = .67). There was also no evidence of a difference in the rates of staff absenteeism (adjusted incident rate ratio, 0.80 95% CI, 0.55-1.16; P = .24). Results were similar for the residents exposed only to communal room HEPA filters.
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this cluster randomized clinical trial, there was no difference in resident respiratory infection rates in care homes with HEPA filters in communal areas and bedrooms. Care homes should continue existing recommended prevention measures to control respiratory and other infections.
Trial Registration:
isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN63437172.
More Related Videos
09:32Evaluating the Effect of Coated Filters and Pre-Filters on the Infectivity and Concentration of Aerosolized Phi6 Virus
Published on: May 29, 2026
06:27Automated Hospital Room Disinfection Utilizing a Novel Aerosolized Hydrogen Peroxide Microdroplet Disbursing Technology
Published on: February 24, 2026
Related Concept Videos
01:29Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease
01:30Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed.
01:22Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...