Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
Published on: June 1, 2015
Structuring Digital Mental Health Care Navigation: Co-Design Nominal Group Technique Study to Develop the MChart
Jane Koerner1, Luis Salvador-Carulla1,2, Cindy Woods1
1Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Background:
Australia's mental health care system has been characterized by complexity and fragmentation, as highlighted by numerous reports, commissions, and inquiries. In response, digital mental health care navigation tools have emerged as a promising solution to help individuals locate appropriate mental health services. The rapid proliferation of these tools-without a clear understanding of their definitions and characteristics-risks creating confusion rather than clarity for users. Terms such as "navigation" and "navigators" are often used interchangeably, further complicating the landscape.
Objective:
This study addressed the need for a standardized definition and typology of the characteristics of digital mental health care navigation tools.
Methods:
This study was part of the development of a digital mental health care navigation tool for navigators and planners (MChart). It used a co-design approach using expert-based cooperative analysis, which is a nominal group technique to develop a definition and typology of the characteristics of digital mental health care navigation tools. This process was guided by the Technology Readiness Level for Implementation Sciences framework. The co-design process involved two 2-hour sessions with an expert panel comprising 28 participants, including representatives from mental health planning, primary health care, health care financing and delivery, community-managed organizations, clinical settings (psychiatrists, psychologists, and general practitioners), and consumers.
Results:
The expert panel collaboratively developed a consensus definition of digital mental health care navigation tools, outlining their scope and intended targets. Through the co-design process, the panel identified 157 characteristics of digital mental health care navigation tools. These characteristics were organized into 5 primary domains: type, management, content, design, and quality. The definition and typology characteristics provide a structured framework for understanding and evaluating the diverse range of digital mental health care navigation tools currently available.
Conclusions:
The co-designed definition and typology offer a foundational step toward reducing confusion in the digital mental health care navigation space. This study supports the development of quality standards that can be used to assess and compare existing and future tools. This framework has the potential to guide developers, end users, and policymakers in creating more effective, user-centered navigation solutions within Australia's mental health care system and internationally.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...