Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: August 18, 2016
Pharmacological Provocation Tests With Sodium Channel Blockers in Suspected Brugada Syndrome: Are Current Guidelines
Sílvia Ribeiro1, Emídio Mata1, Luísa Pinheiro1
1Serviço de Cardiologia, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Ave, Guimarães, Portugal.
None:
Brugada Syndrome (BrS) is a genetic condition that increases the risk of sudden cardiac death. Diagnosis relies on the presence of a type 1 Brugada electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern, which may be intermittent. In patients without symptoms or family history, the value of pharmacological provocation with sodium channel blockers (SCB) remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the follow-up of patients with a positive ajmaline test who, according to current recommendations, would not have been eligible for undergoing the test. A retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent SCB provocation testing for suspected BrS based on ECG abnormalities, excluding those with prior cardiac arrest, syncope, nocturnal agonal respiration, or family history of BrS or sudden unexplained death. Patients with an induced type 1 Brugada pattern were further evaluated regarding spontaneous type 1 Brugada pattern, pathogenic or probably pathogenic genetic variants or, in the context of family screening, other family members with a Brugada pattern. Among 75 SCB provocation tests performed in patients with suspected Brugada pattern and no family history or relevant symptoms, 50% had a type 1 pattern in the treadmill exercise ECG, 36.7% had other family members with a BrS diagnosis, 23.3% had a spontaneous type 1 pattern in 12-lead ECG during follow-up, 20% had a type 1 pattern in 24-hour modified Holter and 13.3% had a positive genetic test for a pathogenic or probably pathogenic genetic variant. In conclusion, the current guidelines may be excessively restrictive regarding the diagnosis of BrS and, while leading to fewer false positives, may exclude patients with a true BrS diagnosis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Antiepileptic Drugs: Sodium Channel Blockers
Sodium channel blockers modulate ion channels, particularly voltage-gated sodium channels. They block only sodium ion movement.
Among the most commonly prescribed antiepileptic drugs are...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics

