Epithelial Chloride and Bicarbonate Transport in Intestinal Barrier Failure: A Molecular Target-Validation Assessment...

Current inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies suppress immune pathways, yet epithelial recovery can remain incomplete. This review evaluates whether intestinal chloride and bicarbonate transport can support a distinct, adjunctive pharmacological strategy. Rather than cataloguing transport proteins, we compare the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), SLC26A3/down-regulated in adenoma (DRA), and TMEM16A/ANO1 against an evidence hierarchy of human disease relevance, causal epithelial biology, pharmacological tractability, target engagement, functional rescue, and developability. CFTR and DRA form the most coherent module linking bicarbonate availability to mucin expansion, epithelial surface pH, fluid balance, and barrier organization, but their liabilities differ. CFTR is structurally and clinically druggable, yet its modulators are genotype-directed, and broad activation may worsen diarrhea. DRA has stronger evidence for a colonic barrier role and emerging support from human organoids, but no validated activator or stabilizer. TMEM16A has abundant chemical tools, yet uncertain selectivity, wide extra-epithelial expression, and no established disease-modifying role in IBD. No intervention has achieved mucosal healing through anion-transport rescue in IBD. We therefore define the decisive experiments required before translation: confirmation of persistent functional defects in human tissue, selective exposure-linked rescue in patient-derived epithelium, direct target engagement, and protection against hypersecretion or electrolyte imbalance. The evidence supports focused, mechanism-based evaluation of the CFTR-DRA axis rather than empirical repurposing.