Resting-State vs. Task-Based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neurosurgical Planning: A Narrative Review of...

Background: Accurate presurgical localization of eloquent cortex and subcortical pathways is essential in neurosurgery, guiding the balance between maximal safe resection and preservation of neurological function. This narrative review compares the clinical utility of task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (tb-fMRI) and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) in neurosurgical populations, with emphasis on brain tumors and epilepsy. Methods: This narrative review was based on a non-systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from database inception to March 2026. The review focused on tb-fMRI and rs-fMRI for presurgical functional mapping in neurosurgical populations, including clinical utility, feasibility, validation, limitations, and workflow integration. Results: Tb-fMRI remains the most established noninvasive modality for motor and language mapping and language lateralization because of its task-specific activation maps and established role in clinical workflows. However, its use is limited by dependence on patient cooperation, task performance, and intact neurovascular coupling; thus, aphasia, cognitive impairment, fatigue, paresis, pediatric age, sedation, and tumor-related neurovascular uncoupling may render tb-fMRI inconclusive or misleading. Rs-fMRI offers a task-free alternative based on intrinsic functional connectivity, enabling simultaneous mapping of multiple resting-state networks from a single acquisition and providing particular value in non-cooperative, cognitively impaired, aphasic, pediatric, or sedated patients. Evidence indicates that rs-fMRI is most robust for sensorimotor mapping, with reported agreement with tb-fMRI and intraoperative direct electrical stimulation, whereas language mapping remains less consistent and more dependent on analytical methodology. Neither modality replaces intraoperative stimulation, which remains the reference standard. Conclusions: Current evidence supports a multimodal presurgical strategy in which tb-fMRI is used first-line in cooperative patients; rs-fMRI is added when task-based mapping is limited or infeasible, and both are interpreted alongside tractography, neuronavigation, and intraoperative mapping.