Related Experiment Videos
Provider Perspectives on a Tobacco-Free Workplace Program in Healthcare Settings Serving Rural and Medically
Abigail E Bergey1,2, Isabel Martinez Leal1, Maggie Britton3
1Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Abstract:
People with substance use disorders (SUDs) smoke at elevated rates compared to the general population, experience significant health disparities, and are overrepresented in rural and medically underserved areas with limited substance use treatment centers (SUTCs), leading individuals to seek care at medical healthcare centers (MHCs) (i.e., organizations providing comprehensive primary and preventive care). Thus, understanding MHCs' and SUTCs' capacity for adoption of tobacco-free workplace programs (TFWPs) that involve tobacco-free workplace policies and tobacco use treatment delivery is vital. Centers were continuously enrolled from August 2021 to January 2024, spanning the official duration and ending of the COVID-19 pandemic. As part of a mixed methods study, healthcare providers (N = 347) from 9 MHCs (n = 173) and 10 SUTCs (n = 174) in Texas were surveyed; 85 providers and clinical managers from a subset of this sample, drawn from 5 MHCs and 7 SUTCs, completed interviews about their perception of resource availability for, and value of, TFWPs. The organizational readiness for change theory guided the development of investigator-generated surveys and interviews focused on assessing the constructs of resource availability for and valuing of TFWPs. Quantitative findings generally revealed similar perceptions on value and resource availability. However, more MHC than SUTC providers endorsed lack of time as a barrier to delivering cessation care (p = 0.006). Qualitative themes included lack of training and resources to build capacity; limited institutional frameworks, policies, and practices; underprioritizing of tobacco cessation treatment; and erroneous assumptions that tobacco use sustains SUD sobriety. Results emphasize that MHCs need shorter intervention strategies, while SUTCs may be poised for longer interventions as supported through greater endorsement by MHC compared to SUTC providers of time as a barrier to deliver cessation care alongside similar perceptions on value and resource availability across both settings (MHCs, SUTCs). Overall, findings reinforce the need to build greater capacity across healthcare settings for patients' tobacco use treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results from...