MRI Markers of EDSS ≥ 3 in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: An Assessment of Lesion Burden, Brain Volumetry,

Sami A Alghamdi1, Othman I Alomair1, Manal H Alosaimi1

  • 1Radiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 145111, Riyadh 4545, Saudi Arabia.

Brain Sciences
|July 28, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Fractional brain volumes and lesion counts better identify moderate-to-severe disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) than absolute volumes. Combining these MRI markers showed moderate diagnostic performance.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) arises from complex pathologies potentially missed by single MRI markers.
  • A score of 3 or higher on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) signifies clinically meaningful moderate-to-severe disability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the cross-sectional ability of brain volumetric measures and IVIM-DWI parameters to identify RRMS patients with EDSS ≥ 3.
  • To compare the discriminatory performance of absolute versus fractional volumetric measures.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 189 RRMS patients with complete MRI (volumetric, IVIM-DWI) and EDSS data.
  • Stratification into EDSS < 3 and EDSS ≥ 3 groups.
  • Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses of individual and combined MRI markers, including lesion count, IVIM-DWI parameters, and volumetric measures (absolute and fractional).

Main Results:

  • Patients with EDSS ≥ 3 exhibited higher lesion counts, higher ADC and D values, lower gray matter, white matter, and brain parenchymal volumes, and higher CSF volume and fraction, alongside lower brain parenchymal fraction (BPF).
  • BPF and CSF fraction demonstrated the strongest single-marker discrimination (AUC=0.705), outperforming lesion count (AUC=0.696) and absolute brain volume (AUC=0.503).
  • A combined model of lesion count + BPF achieved an AUC of 0.757, with the addition of perfusion fraction (f) yielding the highest cross-validated AUC of 0.746, though with modest, non-significant improvement.

Conclusions:

  • Fractional volumetric measures, particularly BPF, are more effective than absolute brain volumes for stratifying RRMS disability (EDSS ≥ 3).
  • The combination of lesion count, BPF, and perfusion fraction (f) showed the highest performance among evaluated MRI models, though overall discrimination was moderate.
  • Further validation in larger, longitudinal cohorts is warranted to confirm these exploratory findings and the incremental value of IVIM-DWI parameters.

Related Concept Videos