Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Adapting Human Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study Methods to Detect and Characterize Dysphagia in Murine Disease Models
Published on: March 1, 2015
Dysphagia Phenotypes in COVID-19 Pneumonia Versus Aspiration Pneumonia: A Retrospective Quantitative
Su Jung Park1, Hyun Seok1, Sang-Hyun Kim1
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 170 Jomaru-ro, Wonmi-gu, Bucheon 14584, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Comparisons of swallowing physiology between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and clinically diagnosed aspiration pneumonia (AP) have largely relied on ordinal scales, leaving etiology-specific biomechanical profiles unclear. We quantitatively compared videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) measures of pharyngeal residue and clearance mechanics to identify differential dysphagia phenotypes. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 50 adult inpatients with pneumonia (COVID-19, n = 25; AP, n = 25) who underwent VFSS for suspected dysphagia. COVID-19 pneumonia was laboratory-confirmed, and AP was clinically diagnosed after negative tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Blinded ImageJ analysis examined the first standardized semisolid yogurt swallow (International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative level 4). Primary outcomes were Normalized Residue Ratio Scale values for the valleculae (NRRSv) and piriform sinuses (NRRSp); secondary outcomes were upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening width and epiglottic rotation angle. Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) score, hyoid displacement, and pharyngeal transit time were exploratory. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable. COVID-19 pneumonia showed higher NRRSv (0.20 [0.12-0.56] vs. 0.13 [0.00-0.20]; p = 0.01). NRRSp was numerically higher but not statistically significant (0.12 [0.00-0.43] vs. 0.00 [0.00-0.17]; p = 0.07). COVID-19 pneumonia also showed smaller UES opening width (5.08 ± 2.48 vs. 6.50 ± 2.01 mm; p = 0.03) and reduced epiglottic rotation angle (66.0 [29.0-80.8] vs. 93.4 [74.2-100.4] degrees; p = 0.04). No statistically significant between-group difference was detected in PAS-defined airway invasion severity on the standardized semisolid task. Conclusions: These findings suggest an efficiency-predominant dysphagia phenotype in COVID-19 pneumonia, characterized by greater vallecular residue and restrictive clearance-related mechanics on a standardized semisolid task. The results indicate that PAS-defined safety metrics alone may underestimate residue-related dysphagia burden in this population.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia I: Introduction
Risk Factors
Various factors influence the likelihood of developing pneumonia. Age plays a crucial role, with infants, children under two, and individuals over 65 at increased risk due to their...
Esophageal Achalasia
