Related Experiment Videos
HER2-Low Versus HER2-Zero Breast Cancer in the Neoadjuvant Setting: Pathological Complete Response and Exploratory
Ümitcan Ateş1, Merve Keskinkılıç2, Hatice Miraç Binnaz Demirkan3
1Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, 35100 Izmir, Türkiye.
None:
Background and Objectives: The HER2-low designation has emerged as a clinically actionable category in breast cancer following the approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2-low metastatic disease. However, the clinical relevance of HER2-low expression in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) setting remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate pathological complete response (pCR) as the primary endpoint and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) as exploratory secondary endpoints across HER2-low, HER2-zero, and HER2-positive subgroups in a NAC-treated cohort. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 118 patients with histopathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer who received NAC at our institution between January 2010 and March 2021. Patients were classified as HER2-zero (IHC 0, n = 66), HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/FISH-non-amplified, n = 17), or HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/FISH-amplified, n = 35). pCR was defined as ypT0/Tis ypN0. Univariate analyses used χ2 or Fisher's exact tests; multivariable logistic and Cox regression were performed for adjusted analyses, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared by log-rank, Breslow, and Tarone-Ware tests. Results: The overall pCR rate was 24.6%, differing significantly across HER2 subgroups (HER2-positive 45.7%, HER2-low 29.4%, HER2-zero 12.1%; p = 0.001). After multivariable adjustment for age, ER, PR, and tumor grade, HER2-positive status retained an independent association with pCR (OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.46-13.10, p = 0.008), whereas HER2-low status did not (OR 2.65, 95% CI 0.60-11.75, p = 0.201). At a median follow-up of 48.8 months, neither OS (log-rank p = 0.567) nor DFS (log-rank p = 0.901) differed significantly across HER2 subgroups, and HER2 subgroup status was not independently associated with survival in exploratory Cox models. Conclusions: In this NAC-treated cohort, the unadjusted pCR advantage of HER2-low over HER2-zero tumors was not retained after adjustment for hormone receptor expression and tumor grade, and no HER2 subgroup-specific survival difference was demonstrated. Within the standard NAC framework, HER2-low disease did not show a pCR or survival pattern clearly distinct from HER2-zero disease after adjustment; the small HER2-low subgroup and wide confidence intervals preclude firm conclusions, and an exploratory hormone receptor-stratified analysis indicated that the apparent pooled HER2-low advantage was confined to the hormone receptor-negative subgroup. Future prospective studies powered for hormone receptor-stratified analyses are warranted.