Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Multimodal 3D Printing of Phantoms to Simulate Biological Tissue
Published on: January 11, 2020
HMQ-ES-Stack-GBR: A Hybrid Ensemble Learning Model for Mechanical and Physical Quality Prediction in FDM 3D Printing
1Afyon Vocational School, Electronics and Automation Department, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar 03200, Turkey.
None:
In Fusion Deposition Modeling-based manufacturing, process parameters affect the mechanical and physical properties of the print. Considering these properties, accurately predicting print quality is essential. This is where machine learning (ML) models for three-dimensional (3D) print quality prediction come to the forefront. In this study, a dataset was prepared under strict operational measurement standards-utilizing the Interquartile Range (IQR) method for data sanitization-encompassing 10 material types, 2 printer types, and 4 printing parameters. Five hundred different sample combinations were prepared and printed in sets of three according to ISO 527-2 Type 4 standard dimensions. Tensile, hardness, and surface roughness tests were applied to the prepared samples. Using this validated dataset, a Hybrid Multi-Material Quality-Ensemble System-Stacking-Gradient Boosting Regressor (HMQ-ES-Stack-GBR) architecture is proposed as a diagnostic framework for multi-output quality prediction. Particularly in terms of quality outputs such as tensile strength, hardness, and surface roughness, while also providing a quantitative analysis of the effect of material type on print quality. Furthermore, a multi-objective optimization pipeline integrating three distinct meta-heuristic algorithms-Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO)-was coupled with the framework to systematically derive material-specific optimal processing parameter configurations. Furthermore, the study shows that open-system printers exhibit higher prediction errors than closed-system printers. Reflecting system-induced variability rather than full hardware independence. Although the study is limited to internal validation within the current experimental design and includes material imbalance across filament groups, the findings suggest that the proposed framework provides a promising diagnostic decision-support tool for pre-print quality estimation within the studied dataset. By accurately reflecting rather than physically overcoming manufacturing variability, it supports decision-making processes through pre-print quality estimation, thereby enabling proactive interventions that reduce raw material, time, and energy losses.

