Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Comprehensive Endovascular and Open Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations
Published on: October 20, 2017
Endovascular Therapy Versus Open Surgery for Common Femoral Artery Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease: A Systematic
Chuwen Chen1, Yiyuan Li1, Jing Hu2
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Insights
Endovascular therapy (EVT) for common femoral artery disease reduces early complications and hospital stays compared to open surgery (OS). However, open surgery offers more durable patency and fewer reinterventions, necessitating individualized treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Disease
Background:
- Optimal revascularization for common femoral artery (CFA) atherosclerotic occlusive disease is debated.
- Comparing endovascular therapy (EVT) and open surgery (OS) is crucial for treatment decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze perioperative and long-term outcomes of EVT versus OS for CFA atherosclerotic occlusive disease.
- To compare key clinical endpoints including morbidity, patency, reintervention, and survival.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
- Searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov.
- Pooled time-to-event data as hazard ratios (HRs) and assessed risk of bias and evidence certainty.
Main Results:
- EVT reduced 30-day morbidity, wound complications, and hospital stay compared to OS.
- EVT increased distal embolization and follow-up major amputation rates.
- OS demonstrated more durable patency and lower reintervention rates, though amputation-free survival was similar.
Conclusions:
- EVT offers advantages in early recovery and reduced complications.
- OS provides superior long-term patency and fewer reinterventions.
- Individualized treatment is recommended due to heterogeneous and observational evidence.
Abstract:
The optimal revascularization strategy for common femoral artery (CFA) atherosclerotic occlusive disease remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared perioperative and long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) and open surgery (OS). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through 15 March 2026 for comparative studies of EVT versus OS in CFA atherosclerotic occlusive disease. Outcomes included perioperative morbidity, wound complications, hospital stay, patency, reintervention, major amputation, and survival. Time-to-event data were pooled as hazard ratios (HRs), reported or reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves. Risk of bias and evidence certainty were assessed. Results: Eleven studies with 2835 patients were included. Compared with OS, EVT reduced 30-day morbidity (OR, 0.34; 95% CI: 0.26-0.44), wound complications (OR, 0.14; 95% CI: 0.09-0.23), surgical-site infections, lymphatic complications, myocardial infarction, and hospital stay (mean difference, -4.68 days; 95% CI: -5.49 to -3.86). Distal embolization increased after EVT (OR, 2.45; 95% CI: 1.28-4.70). Follow-up major amputation was higher after EVT in event-rate analyses (OR, 2.42; 95% CI: 1.19-4.93), although amputation-free survival was similar (HR, 1.01; 95% CI: 0.83-1.23). EVT had higher hazards of loss of primary patency (HR, 1.72), loss of secondary patency (HR, 2.03), and reintervention (HR, 1.51). Conclusions: EVT offers fewer early complications and shorter hospitalization, whereas OS provides more durable patency and fewer reinterventions. Given observational, heterogeneous evidence, treatment should be individualized.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management
