Cryobiopsy Outperforms Fine-Needle Aspiration for Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy: A Within-Patient Diagnostic Accuracy...

Background/Objectives: Accurate diagnosis of lymph node pathology is essential for the management of both malignant and benign diseases. This study compares the diagnostic performance of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in a real-world cohort. Methods: A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted, including 91 patients who underwent both cryobiopsy and EBUS-TBNA for lymph node evaluation. EBUS-TBNA was performed with a 19-G needle and cryobiopsy with a 1.1 mm flexible cryoprobe. Clinical characteristics, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) findings, ultrasonographic characteristics of the lymph nodes, diagnostic yield, and procedure-related complications were analyzed. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and factors associated with correct diagnosis were assessed. Results: The median age of the cohort was 65 years [interquartile range-IQR-56-74], 63.7% were male, and 74.7% were former or current smokers. Malignant disease was ultimately diagnosed in 60 patients (65.9%), of whom 78.3% had non-lymphoproliferative tumours and 21.7% had lymphoproliferative malignancies. The diagnostic accuracy of cryobiopsy was 89%, compared with 82.4% for EBUS-TBNA. The paired comparison between the two techniques did not reach statistical significance. After exclusion of non-diagnostic samples, sensitivity was numerically higher for cryobiopsy (96.4%, 95% CI 90.7-100) than for EBUS-TBNA (88.9%, 95% CI 79.6-98.2). Factors associated with correct diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for cryobiopsy, cardiovascular comorbidities, and maximum SUV for EBUS-TBNA. In malignant lesions, cryobiopsy showed higher diagnostic accuracy than EBUS-TBNA (90% vs. 80% accuracy), particularly in lymphoproliferative diseases. In benign lesions, both techniques agreed in 17 (54%) of cases, with cryobiopsy showing a higher yield for sarcoidosis and contributing to the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Complications were infrequent and minor, with no major adverse events reported. Conclusions: Cryobiopsy showed numerically higher diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity compared with EBUS-TBNA, particularly in malignant and lymphoproliferative disorders, with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its role as a valuable complement-or alternative-to conventional EBUS-TBNA in the assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes.