Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Bleeding Risk Assessment and Management
Adil Salihu1, David Meier1, Thabo Mahendiran1
1Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Insights
Preventing bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is crucial for high bleeding risk (HBR) patients. This review details risk assessment tools and strategies like radial access and optimized antiplatelet therapy to improve outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Bleeding is a major complication following coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Increasing numbers of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) necessitate effective bleeding prevention strategies.
- Bleeding post-PCI is linked to adverse outcomes, including prolonged hospitalization and increased mortality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current evidence on assessing and reducing bleeding risk in patients undergoing PCI.
- To provide practical guidance for managing bleeding risk before, during, and after PCI procedures.
- To highlight strategies for HBR patients, including those with atrial fibrillation or cytopenias.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and clinical guidelines on bleeding risk assessment and management in PCI.
- Discussion of validated risk stratification tools such as BARC, ARC-HBR, PRECISE-DAPT, and DAPT scores.
- Analysis of evidence-based strategies for bleeding reduction, including procedural access, anticoagulation, and antiplatelet selection.
Main Results:
- Several tools effectively identify patients at high bleeding risk.
- Strategies like radial access, optimized anticoagulation, appropriate antiplatelet selection, and newer stents can reduce bleeding.
- Specific considerations for managing patients with atrial fibrillation, anemia, or thrombocytopenia are discussed.
Conclusions:
- Significant advancements have been made in managing bleeding risk in PCI.
- Further research is needed to address remaining questions on transfusion thresholds, complex antithrombotic therapy, and the bleeding-ischemia trade-off.
- Ongoing trials aim to refine PCI management for HBR patients.
Abstract:
Bleeding is one of the most common and feared complications after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is associated with longer hospital stays, higher mortality, and worse clinical outcomes. As the number of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) continues to grow, preventing bleeding has become an important part of PCI management. This practical review summarizes current evidence on how to assess bleeding risk and reduce bleeding before, during, and after PCI. Several tools, including the BARC classification, ARC-HBR criteria, PRECISE-DAPT, and DAPT scores, help identify patients who may benefit from tailored treatment. Current strategies include the use of radial access, optimized anticoagulation, appropriate selection of antiplatelet therapy, newer-generation drug-eluting stents, and shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy in selected HBR patients. We also discuss the management of patients with atrial fibrillation requiring oral anticoagulation, as well as those with anemia or thrombocytopenia. Although significant progress has been made, several questions remain unanswered, particularly regarding transfusion thresholds, antithrombotic therapy in complex patients, and the best balance between bleeding and ischemic risks. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to provide further evidence and help improve the management of patients undergoing PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Angina IV: Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care