Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Computer Vision-Based Biomass Estimation for Invasive Plants
Published on: February 9, 2024
Multi-Sensor NDVI Fusion for Daily Crop Evapotranspiration Mapping: A Six-Year Irrigated Maize Assessment Using
Zsolt Zoltán Fehér1, Gift Siphiwe Nxumalo1, Attila Nagy1
1Institute of Water and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Böszörményi út 146/b, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
None:
Accurate crop evapotranspiration (ETc) estimation at high spatial and temporal resolution remains a major challenge for precision irrigation. This study presents a multi-sensor data fusion framework combining daily MODIS (250 m), Sentinel-2 (10 m), and Landsat 8/9 (30 m) imagery with FAO-56 Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration (ET0) to generate pixel-wise daily ETc maps for irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) near Nyírbátor, Hungary, over six growing seasons (2020-2025). The proposed Median Time Series Model exploits field-scale MODIS NDVI as a temporal backbone and derives pixel-wise linear transfer functions to reconstruct daily NDVI at 10-30 m resolution. Three gap-filling strategies were compared; the median approach yielded the highest agreement (NDVI reconstruction R2 = 0.81; RMSE = 0.19 (NDVI units); pixel-wise correlation 0.70-0.85) and effectively suppressed sub-pixel spectral mixture artefacts. Sentinel-2 consistently outperformed Landsat 8/9 (pixel-wise R2 = 0.36-0.78 vs. 0.001-0.91). A nonlinear power crop coefficient model (Kc = a · NDVIb) proved more robust than linear rescaling (mean validation R2 of 0.80 (power) vs. 0.71 (rescale) across Sentinel-2 seasons; both methods were positive in all six seasons after correcting an unconstrained-fit artefact). Seasonal ETc ranged from 313 to 545 mm, with cumulative water deficits reaching -334 mm during the 2021 drought. Six-year mean seasonal ETc (428-483 mm for Sentinel-2) falls within the 400-600 mm range published for irrigated maize under comparable continental conditions, with season-integrated ETc/ET0 ratios (rescale method mean 0.86; power method mean 0.84) consistent with expected FAO-56 Kc trajectories. Cross-validation against an independent MATLAB implementation confirmed algorithmic consistency (reference ET0 (R2 = 0.88-0.91, Pearson r = 0.97-1.00)) and daily ETc while identifying meteorological input as the dominant source of absolute ETc uncertainty (estimated at ±15-30% through first-order error propagation). Plausibility assessment was limited to comparison with published seasonal benchmarks and an independent algorithmic implementation; no eddy covariance or lysimeter measurements were available for direct ETc validation.
Related Concept Videos
Light Acquisition
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
Levels of Use of a GIS
Precipitation Gravimetry
In determining nickel by gravimetric analysis, a precipitant of ethanolic dimethylglyoxime is added to a hot nickel salt solution. This is quickly followed by the dropwise addition of dilute ammonia solution until precipitation occurs. A...
GIS Software, Hardware, and Sources of GIS Data
Precipitation and Co-precipitation