Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

07:32
Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
Published on: February 23, 2024
Micro-computed tomography evaluation of aligner fitting on anchorage attachments
İlter Burak Köse1, Eyüp Burak Küçük2, Meral Arslan Malkoç3
1Department of Orthodontics, Mersin Oral and Dental Health Hospital, Mersin, Türkiye.
Korean Journal of Orthodontics
|July 28, 2026
Summary
Clear aligner (CA) fit to attachments varied by material and thickness. CA PRO-Hard demonstrated superior fit in specific regions, indicating material properties significantly influence dental appliance adaptation.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Biomaterials Science
- Dental Technology
Background:
- Clear aligners (CAs) are increasingly used in orthodontic treatment.
- Accurate fit of CAs to anchorage attachments is crucial for effective tooth movement.
- Material properties and thickness of CAs can influence their adaptation to dental models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the fit of clear aligners (CAs) made from different materials and thicknesses to anchorage attachments.
- To compare three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) analyses of air gaps between CAs and attachments.
Main Methods:
- Forty CAs of varying materials (PET-G, ABA) and thicknesses (0.50 mm, 0.625 mm, 0.75 mm) were tested.
- Micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT) was used to scan CAs fitted onto a master model with attachments.
- 3D volumetric analysis and 2D sectional analysis were performed to quantify air gaps, with a 20 μm threshold for practical relevance.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in overall 3D air-gap volume were found among the tested CA groups.
- 2D analysis revealed significant localized fit differences, particularly in palatal and gingival sections.
- PET-G aligners showed greater gap widths than CA PRO-Hard in critical areas, exceeding the 20 μm threshold.
Conclusions:
- Micro-CT provides detailed assessment of CA fit to attachments.
- While volumetric analysis showed no significant differences, sectional analysis highlighted material-dependent variations in fit.
- CA PRO-Hard exhibited superior adaptation in specific regions, suggesting material choice impacts precision in clear aligner therapy.