Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Development of Multiplex Real-Time RT-qPCR Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A/B, and MERS-CoV
Published on: November 10, 2023
Effects of a diagnostic stewardship intervention to de-implement widespread use of a rapid respiratory multiplex PCR
Timothy C Jenkins1,2,3,4, Heather L Young1,2, David L Wyles1,2
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Denver Health, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Abstract:
Rapid respiratory diagnostic tests are widely utilized but often do not change clinical management. We evaluated the effects of an intervention to de-implement widespread use of a multiplex respiratory pathogen PCR panel (RPP) in favor of a selective use strategy. This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental study conducted in a safety-net healthcare system. We compared RPP utilization during 2 years of unrestricted, widespread use (24 July 2022-23 July 2024) and 1 year after implementation of a selective use strategy (24 July 2024-23 July 2025). The primary outcome was change in weekly test volume as assessed by interrupted time-series analysis (ITS). During the widespread and selective use periods, 8,923 and 184 RPPs were performed, respectively. By ITS, test volume declined by 66 per week (P < 0.001) immediately after the intervention; this reduction was sustained over the subsequent year. Median weekly tests decreased from 83 (IQR 67-103) to 3 (IQR 2-5) (P < 0.001), a relative decline of 96.4%. The median age of patients tested decreased from 50 to 7 years (P < 0.001). The proportion of positive tests was similar (32.1% vs 35.9%; P = 0.28); however, the pathogens detected differed. Annualized laboratory costs decreased from $741,446 to $30,623. Use of an influenza/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 PCR decreased from a weekly median of 331 (IQR 189-586) to 118 (IQR 25-390) (P < 0.001). An intervention to de-implement widespread use of an RPP in favor of selective use led to a greater than 95% reduction in tests that was sustained over 1 year.
Importance:
Use of rapid respiratory multiplex PCR panels (RPPs) is widespread but has not been shown to reduce antibiotic use or improve clinical outcomes. Reducing low-value use of these tests is therefore an important diagnostic stewardship target. To our knowledge, this is the first study describing a successful intervention to de-implement widespread use of this test among pediatric and adult patients and in ambulatory and inpatient care locations in favor of targeted use.
Related Concept Videos
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Rapid Identification of Pathogens
