Related Experiment Videos
Feasibility-First Risk Management for Clinical AI: A Deterministic Systems Intelligence Framework for Release,
1Practice of Medicine and Clinical Integrated Programmes, School of Medicine, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
|July 28, 2026
Summary
This study introduces a Deterministic Systems Intelligence (DSI) framework for clinical AI risk management. It ensures AI outputs are feasible and safe for healthcare action, preventing premature release and promoting responsible AI implementation.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Clinical Risk Management
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely adopted in healthcare for tasks like prediction, diagnosis, and patient monitoring.
- Current safety discussions focus on model performance, bias, and explainability, but overlook the critical question of when AI outputs should be integrated into clinical practice.
- A gap exists in managing the transition of AI outputs from technical plausibility to actionable clinical use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a Deterministic Systems Intelligence (DSI) framework for feasibility-first clinical AI risk management.
- To establish an admissible-state layer for evaluating AI outputs before clinical or organizational action.
- To define governance states for AI output release, ensuring responsible integration into healthcare regimes.
Main Methods:
- Development of the Deterministic Systems Intelligence (DSI) framework.
- Introduction of an admissible-state layer to assess AI outputs based on data fitness, population fit, clinical actionability, workflow capacity, equity, authority, monitoring, and reversibility.
- Classification of AI outputs into five governance states: release, restricted release, active monitoring, rollback, and HOLD.
Main Results:
- The DSI framework provides a structured approach to AI risk management by evaluating release readiness.
- The admissible-state layer ensures AI outputs meet predefined criteria before clinical action, classifying them into distinct governance states.
- A case study demonstrated how the framework manages AI deterioration alerts based on local context and safety controls, including the option to HOLD outputs when insufficient.
Conclusions:
- Responsible clinical AI necessitates more than just predictive capabilities; it requires release readiness, robust monitoring, and the capacity to withhold AI outputs.
- The DSI framework complements existing safety and regulatory approaches by adding a crucial admissibility step before AI action.
- Implementing the DSI framework enhances the safe and effective integration of AI into healthcare settings by prioritizing feasibility and risk management.
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
The issues and trends in healthcare delivery are constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic is one recent issue that wreaked havoc on healthcare systems, causing a shortage of healthcare workers, high demand for medicines and supplies, and increased medical expenditure due to a lack of insurance. Other issues include rising healthcare costs and care fragmentation.
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include: