Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
Mandibular angle osteotomy in Asian patients: A narrative review on techniques, emerging technologies, and
Zhiyang Xie1, Xueshan Bai1, Ziying Guo1
1Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100144, China.
Background:
Mandibular angle osteotomy (MAO) is widely performed in East Asian patients seeking lower-face contouring. Although numerous osteotomy designs and adjunctive technologies have been described, practical guidance for selecting an appropriate technique according to mandibular morphology, surgical endpoints, and surgeon experience remains limited.
Methods:
A narrative review was conducted using a systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase up to December 30, 2025. Studies related to MAO techniques, anatomical classification, aesthetic assessment, adjunctive procedures, emerging technologies, complications, and long-term remodeling were reviewed.
Results:
MAO techniques differ mainly in the starting point, endpoint, and trajectory of the osteotomy line. Long curved osteotomy remains a commonly used approach for prominent mandibular angles, whereas ABC osteotomy, U-shaped osteotomy, V-line osteotomy, mandibular outer cortex reduction, mandibular body osteotomy, genioplasty, and partial masseter muscle resection may be selected according to specific skeletal and soft-tissue features. Surgical endpoints should include not only skeletal reduction but also frontal width, lateral contour, mandibular border smoothness, symmetry, soft-tissue support, neurosensory safety, patient satisfaction, and long-term remodeling. Digital planning, osteotomy templates, navigation, and endoscopic assistance may improve accuracy and safety, especially in anatomically complex cases.
Conclusion:
MAO should be planned as an individualized lower-face contouring procedure rather than a uniform reduction technique. A morphology-based decision-making framework may help clarify indications, optimize surgical endpoints, reduce complications, and improve long-term aesthetic outcomes. Future studies should emphasize standardized outcome measures, patient-reported outcomes, and long-term three-dimensional assessment.
Level Of Evidence:
V.
